This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
She is too young to be so severely punished
Published on May 6, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Writing
What can you say of a girl of nineteen who took a single false step. That she is young. That she is ambitious. That she took a short cut to fame. Yes, you can say all this about a young Harvard sophomore called Kavyaaa Viswanathan, She is the only child a doctor parents who trained her from childhood to enter the portals of a great institution of higher learning--Harvard. She is by all accounts a bright, well groomed sophomore. Unfortunately for her her book, How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got aLife which was published recently by Little Brown and Co has strirred by a hornet's nest of intellectual property right issues. Simply put issues referred to as plagarism.

A few weeks back the Harvard Crimson published a story saying that Kaavyaa had lifted certain passages from another young adult writer Megan McCaffert's novels Sloppy First and Second Helping. A perusal of the two books does suggest similarities in language but there is no passage that is a straioght lift from either book. Kaavyaa has stated that she had read the two books by McCaffert and had "internalised her language". She issued a public apology and her publisher Little Brown and Co withdrew all copies of the book. I managed to get a copy as I live in a different country and even here the distributors are withdrawing all copies of her book. Kaavyaa received an advance of 500,000 US $ and she was forced to return that amont. Personally speaking I feel that this young girl has been punished enough. Her name and reputation in tatters, Kavyaa should now be left to purue her studies.

The alarming part of this entire sequence of events is that Harvard University is seriously considering action against her. We do not know what the Deans and Professors of Harvard have in their minds. But this I know that 19 is too tender an age for ones's life to be irrevocably damaged. I appeal to all those concerned to have mercy on that girl. Punisher her if you will. But dont for God's sake damage her forever.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 13, 2006
'child' is getting younger now, having lost a full year of her age during the life of this article~


She is 19 years old and was 17 when the book was written. That how the figures stack up.
on May 15, 2006
She was old enough to SIGN the contract, she's old enough to pay the consequences for violating the terms of the contract.

Face it, Bahu, Kaavya is a thief. Not of merchandise, but of ideas. In the same way a shoplifter should be apprehended and taught the error of their ways, so should this young lady. She obviously has the talent to be a professional writer, but if we let her get away with her thievery, as you propose, by doing nothing more than returning the money she gained off of her theft, we have taught her nothing.

We are a nation of laws, and nobody is meant to be above them.
on May 15, 2006
I believe she should pay the consequences of her actions and be removed from Harvard (if that is their policy). She has to pay the money back. I think that's enough.

The girl has talent, any college will be glad to have her. In the hopes she will one day be famous and be a donating Alumni.

She is young. I can honestly say I am very glad people showed me mercy when I was 17, 18, and 19 and did outrageous, and yes, illegal things. I always paid for my mistakes, but was fortunate no one ever demanded blood...or worse, my future.

I too believe once Harvard mets out its punishment and she pays back the money...its time to let her move on.
on May 16, 2006
She is young. I can honestly say I am very glad people showed me mercy when I was 17, 18, and 19 and did outrageous, and yes, illegal things. I always paid for my mistakes, but was fortunate no one ever demanded blood...or worse, my future.


Thats right. She has not sasked for mercy. She has not been a thief . Yes she did take a few phrases which she reworkrd. That is not plagarism. I do not think Harvard will be influenced by the argument that she has plagarised. I think all of us owe it to that young girl to let her move on.
on May 17, 2006
Right. She obviously didn't plagiarise, because publishers regularly recall millions of dollars worth of books they've been promoting for no reason whatsoever! They LIKE losing money!

Kaavya should instantly be promoted to editor of the New York Times. Seems like a good fit to me!
on May 19, 2006
Kaavya should instantly be promoted to editor of the New York Times. Seems like a good fit


I did not say that. I have always maintained that she did wrong and thast she deserves a chance to redeem herself . Come on that girl is barely an adult. 18 or 19 years and that is too young an age for excecution.
on May 19, 2006
Come on that girl is barely an adult. 18 or 19 years and that is too young an age for excecution.


BEING KICKED OUT OF ONE SCHOOL IS NOT AN EXECUTION. Get it?

You make it sound as if she will never have any more chances to work if she is dismissed from Harvard. This is hardly the case; good writing speaks for itself. But so far, she's only received pity; no real punishment.

My 10 year old received a harsher penalty for plagiarism, for crying out loud! I GUARANTEE she'll think twice before doing it again.
on May 19, 2006
Bahu, you still have not answered my question.

What age is "too young" to know that plagiarism is wrong?

You seem to think that a 17 year-old girl is too immature to know that plagiarism is wrong. That when a 17 year-old propels themselves to fame and fortune with plagiarism, it's just a "mistake".

At what age did you learn that taking credit for someone else's work was wrong? Were you younger than 17? Older? Do you consider yourself to be a slow learner or a fast learner, when it comes to the morality of lying and cheating? Would you say that most people should be able to figure it out faster, or slower, than you did?

Are you arguing that this girl is morally handicapped who should be given the same free pass we give to physically and mentally handicapped people, in that we don't expect them to function as healthy and responsible adults, and don't punish them when they fall short of that standard?

Or are you arguing that she's in full possession of her moral faculties, and we cannot reasonably expect better moral choices from *any* 17 year-old?
on May 20, 2006
What age is "too young" to know that plagiarism is wrong?


Dan Brown also faced similar charges. I have read Holy Blood and Holy Grailand also Da Vinci Codethere are a few similarities in content argument and yes the overall genaral theme as well. However the judge ruled in favor of Dan Brown.
on May 20, 2006
What age is "too young" to know that plagiarism is wrong?


Dan Brown also faced similar charges. I have read Holy Blood and Holy Grailand also Da Vinci Codethere are a few similarities in content argument and yes the overall genaral theme as well. However the judge ruled in favor of Dan Brown.
on May 20, 2006
When I first heard this story my first reaction was she didn't deserve all the negative reactions she was receiving. But after it came out that it just wasn't one author she took from but two, and the fact that she hasn't seem to shown any remorse I reluctantly changed my mind.

Why not just tell the truth when it first came out? I think if she would've came out and told the complete truth of all she done she wouldn't be in the position she finds herself in right now. Despite all that I still feel kinda sorry for her and I do hope she rises above it all, and is not known just for her "mistake". But at the same time I do believe she should be punished, and if Harvard does take action then so be it. I'm sure there are other Ivy League schools that would be happy to have her, and who knows, it might be the best thing for her to a get a new start at a new school.
on May 20, 2006
BTW ... is post #26 a double post or did you plagiarized yourself from post #25?
on May 20, 2006
She is 19 years old and was 17 when the book was written.


She was younger when parts of it were written.

She has to pay the money back. I think that's enough.


If the only penalty for being a thief is occasionally having to give back the parts of your ill-gotten gain that can be proved to be stolen, how is than incentive to do anything other than become a better thief?
on May 22, 2006
If the only penalty for being a thief is occasionally having to give back the parts of your ill-gotten gain that can be proved to be stolen, how is than incentive to do anything other than become a better thief?


BINGO!
on Jun 20, 2011

The morning newspapers reported that the parents of Ms Kaavya Vishwanathan--Dr Rajaram and Dr Mary Sundaram-were both killed in an aircrash near Rickebbacker, Ohio. Dr Rajaram, a noted surgeon and a trained pilot was piloting the small plane from Washington DC were both had gone to see thie daughter.

I feel saddened at the loss and I pray that the Kaavya finds the strength to bear this great loss.

The cause of the crash is not known.

 

2 Pages1 2