This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Why Israel cannot afford to be recalcitrant
Published on June 5, 2010 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events

Israel enjoys a high degree of goodwill in many parts of the world and even professional critics of Israel have found much to admire in the manner in which the State of Israel conducts its no nonsense foreigh policy. The world opinion be damnned. As long of USA is not overly critical Israel does not seem to care. The lastest outrage committed on the high sea seems to have taken even the Obama Administration by surprise and Hilary Clinton has joined the rest of the world in condemning Islaer's action in using military might against a flottila carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. The world has come to recognise that the economic blokade imposed by Israel is causing untold misery to the people of the Palestenianterritory. If by following this policy Israel hopes to undermine the support base of the HAMAS, the policy is claerly not succeeding. In fact the blokade has only increased the level of public acceptability of HAMAS. The economic blokade has failed in its expressly stated purpose but has succeeeded in imposing collective punishment on the people of Gaza for electing the Hamas.

Israel has used unacceptable level of force in dealing with the flotilla carrying, afterall hum,anitarian aid to the people of Gaza. The boat did not carry any military equipment or even machinery. It only carried tents, balnkets, medicines, school text books, toys, food aand relief material. Israel could have allowed the passage of ther aid flotilla insteasd of brutally attacking and causing the death of 10 aid workers. Video footage shows the Israeli paratroopers rapelling on to the deck of the vessels and opening fire. Israel's claim that they were atrtcked first carries no convixction as the aid flitilla was on international waters when the incedent happened. I do agree that Israel has a very difficult security environment and aslo recluctanly have to conced that the security wall, often called apartheid wall has given security to the civilians as there have been far fewer suicide bombings now than before. By saying this we should not be encouraging Israel with its hard straecraft, though it is enviably successful.

The War launched against the residents of Gaza in 2008-2009 resulted, for the first time in the 65 year history of Israel in a withdrawl without achieving any major strategic objrective. The rockets attacks have stopped but for how long remains open to question. The degradation of the Hamas and its military capability has clearly not been achieved. Under these circumstances Israel could have been more circumspect.

There is yet another issue causing international disquiet. This is to do with Israel's nuclear programme. The Barack Obama administration is obsessed over Iran's nuclear material even though Iran has complied will all its obligations under the NPT to which Iran is a signatory. The nulear matwerial exchange agreement signed with Turkey and other countries effectively puts Iran's spent fuel under international scrutiny. Israel on the other hand in not a signatory to the NPT and has been carrying out a covert nuclear amrs program for the past 3 to 4 decades in a facilty in the NEGEV desert.The revelations of Mordechai Vanunu the Israeli expert has proved to the whole world the existence of the nuclear program. US experts believe that Israel possesses around 100 warheads just a screw driver away from deployment. Under these circumstances peace in the Middle East will look a dismal prospect.

Israel must respond to the consistent US call for a return to the Road Map and the process agreed with the quartet.

 

 


Comments (Page 2)
7 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Jun 08, 2010

The only problem with the Kurds is that their land is resource poor.

on Jun 08, 2010

Dr Guy
The only problem with the Kurds is that their land is resource poor.

Kurdistan is fantastically rich. Saddam took Kirkuk from the Kurds because of the oil fields. And south-eastern Anatolia has water resources that control Syria and Mesopotamia.

on Jun 09, 2010

A Turkish islamist defends Israel:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704025304575284721280274694.html

A Kuwaiti news paper defends Israel:

http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/4342.htm#_edn1

Isn't it interesting the Arab media and Turkish islamists are trying to calm things down while the European media call for blood?

 

on Jun 09, 2010

If any group should get their own country its the Kurds. Again look at Iraqi, they're not rioting or bombing or demanding their own country. They're preparing and showing that they should have one. Thoughts? Agreed? Disagreed
Ah, yes. Another sanctimonious homicide-bomber apologist prescribing what Israel 'must' do. The only surprise is that it took you so long to post it, Bahu

This statement is absurd. I have not even once supported the fanatics who kill either in the name of religion or political ideology.

National self detemination was the weapon used to break up the Ottoman Empire after word war I. Today nationalism and its cohort the nation state have beome irrlevant.

on Jun 09, 2010

This statement is absurd. I have not even once supported the fanatics who kill either in the name of religion or political ideology.

In defence of Bahu, I have seen him defend Israel and condemn Hamas openly and loudly during the Gaza conflict. When Israel and the world needed the truth, Bahu was there to provide.

 

National self detemination was the weapon used to break up the Ottoman Empire after word war I. Today nationalism and its cohort the nation state have beome irrlevant.

Why would nationalism and the nation state be irrelevant? In the ME most nations are still stateless.

The injustice of handing over Ottoman- and European-ruled territories to Arab regimes has not been resolved yet.

The ME has to be redone from the west to the east.

Morocco and Algeria will have to start respecting the native (Berber) populations, allow Berber parties and make Tamazight an official language. Libya will have to be totally reformed. Tunisia and all Arab states will have to be confronted about expelling their Jewish populations and stealing their land.

Egypt will have to recognise the right of the native Christians. The Arab tribes in Sudan will have to stop killing all the Africans. The Arab government of Somalia will have to let those Somali tribes go that want to be ruled by the dictatorship.

"Saudi-Arabia" will have to respect other religions (and Shiites). Syria will have to give up the occupation of Kurdish lands. Iraq (and Kurdistan) will have to accept an Assyrian state.

Turkey will have to recognise the Armenian and Assyrian genocides and grant independent to the Aramaean and Kurdish land it occupies.

And Iran will ideally become a monarchy again.

There is much to do. None of it has much to do with Israel.

 

 

on Jun 09, 2010

This statement is absurd. I have not even once supported the fanatics who kill either in the name of religion or political ideology.

In defence of Bahu, I have seen him defend Israel and condemn Hamas openly and loudly during the Gaza conflict. When Israel and the world needed the truth, Bahu was there to provide.

I extend my apologies for mischaracterizing your views, Bahu.  I still contend too many pretend to know 'what Israel must do', however.

on Jun 09, 2010

"Saudi-Arabia" will have to respect other religions (and Shiites).

This slowly happening.  The RCC is working to get the administration to recognize the Christians there.  While the gov't may not respect other religions yet the local level is showing signs of more tolerance.  A friend of mine was just over in that area and was telling me the best way to find a church in that town was to ask a Police Officer. lol

So while the upper gov't may not be showing respect the masses are.

on Jun 10, 2010

Why would nationalism and the nation state be irrelevant? In the ME most nations are still stateless. The injustice of handing over Ottoman- and European-ruled territories to Arab regimes has not been resolved yet.
In defence of Bahu, I have seen him defend Israel and condemn Hamas openly and loudly during the Gaza conflict. When Israel and the world needed the truth, Bahu was there to provide.
I extend my apologies for mischaracterizing your views, Bahu. I still contend too many pretend to know 'what Israel must do', however.

That is all right. We have known our views over JoeUser for long and somemistakes do happen. No Sweat.

Thank you.

This is important. I believe that after World War I, when the Ottoman Empire disintegrated the Allies, particul;arly Great Britain and to a lesser extent France wwere interested in creating a ring of client states. Remember that Russia had already become socialist. I do not say, as there is little evidence to prove it, that Standard Oil dictated the foreign policy of great powers. But the Liberals of that age allowed themselves to be pursuaded that "national self detrermination" should be the wave of the future.The half-formed societies of Asia, this happy phrase is of V S Naipaul, latched on to this concept to drive the Ottomans out. In Egypt under Ottoman rule the Jews enjoyed security and a lot of latitude for business (see the wonderful work by S D Gotien on the Geninza records) and with Arab "nationalism" promoted by that darling of the Liberals T E Lawrence all this was lost. I believe that NATIONALISM and the Nation-State are the engines of war and destruction and we are seeing the consequences of this in the ME.

on Jun 10, 2010

and with Arab "nationalism" promoted by that darling of the Liberals T E Lawrence all this was lost. I believe that NATIONALISM and the Nation-State are the engines of war and destruction and we are seeing the consequences of this in the ME.

The Arab nationalism promoted by Lawrence was the pro-Zionist Hashemite monarchy. If they had prevailed, we wouldn't have the mess today.

But that Arab nationalism was replaced with Nasser's pan-Arab nationalism modelled after European fascism. Hitler's allies among the Arabs gained the upper hand and the Hashemites were abandoned by the Europeans when it mattered most, in the 1920s.

The point is that apart from the Jews no non-Arab nation became independent.

 

on Jun 11, 2010

The Arab nationalism promoted by Lawrence was the pro-Zionist Hashemite monarchy. If they had prevailed, we wouldn't have the mess

The Wahabi fascist state of Saudi Arabia with the rag heads House of Saud as its absolute monarchs was the creation of the British policy along with the Palestine Mandated territories, the caUSE OF ALL THE PROBLEM NOW.

on Jun 11, 2010

Bahu Virupaksha

The Arab nationalism promoted by Lawrence was the pro-Zionist Hashemite monarchy. If they had prevailed, we wouldn't have the mess
The Wahabi fascist state of Saudi Arabia with the rag heads House of Saud as its absolute monarchs was the creation of the British policy along with the Palestine Mandated territories, the caUSE OF ALL THE PROBLEM NOW.

Yes, this is good Bahu.  Most people don't realize this nor know that the Wahabi have been Islamic radicals for a very very very long time.

on Jun 11, 2010

The Saudi thieves were able to invade and annex the British-allied Kingdom of Hejaz because Britain abandoned her Hashemite allies in Hejaz like Britain abandoned her Hashemite allies in Syria.

 

on Jun 12, 2010

It seems there is a strange nostalgia in all this. A return to the more innocent days when big powers decided the structure of the world. Israel has existed as a state for more than 6 decades and there is no question of any return to Palestine. However Israel expanded its UN mandated limits after 1967, the Yom Kippur war. A return to the 1967 border and the honorable statehood to the Palestineans will go a long way.

I think the peace movement within Israel is also raising the same set of concerns. Not all Israelis are gung-ho about the settlements in occupied territories and the economic blockade of GAZA does not have the support of the main stream Israeli population. Only the right wing supports the blockade.

on Jun 12, 2010

A return to the 1967 border and the honorable statehood to the Palestineans will go a long way.

Go a long way where, Bahu?

A long way toward the destruction of Israel?  Because that's where the Palestinians are going.

Why should we believe that Hamas & Hizbollah will accept anything less than complete & total return of all lands currently part of the state of Israel?  That is their declared objective, after all.

on Jun 12, 2010

What 1967 borders?

In 1967 Israel was surrounded by a cease-fire line that the Arabs didn't accept as a border.

What would a return to the "borders" of the time when no Arab state even recognised Israel do for peace?

Bahu, most Israelis do not see the disputed territories as "occupied territories", just like Saudi-Arabia doesn't see Mecca as "occupied territory".

And most Israelis support blocking weapons from reaching Gaza. In fact most Israelis wanted a much tougher and sooner response to the rocket attacks.

Note that the rocket attacks from Gaza didn't bother the settler movement much. The "settlers" don't live at the border with Gaza. They live in the "West-Bank".

 

7 Pages1 2 3 4  Last