This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Was Justice denied
Published on October 15, 2010 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events

On September 23rd, 2010 a woman, was stretched out on a duree to have her arm punctured with a lethal cocktail of chemicals designed to stop a working, healthy heart. This scence that played itself out in Greensville Corectional Center sent shock waves across the world. For one, this incident put the USA in the same league as Iran, China and sundry other countries which routinely carry out executions and impose the death penalty even on women. I must say that I do not think that a criminal who takes another human being's life deserves mercy so my position is not that of a liberal who oppose the death peanlty on the round thatthe state does not have the right to tke life. My position is based on the facts ofthis particular case as I have been able to glean from sources accessible to me. Nor I am interested in the huge question whether the lethal injection method of excecution is a "cruel and unusual punishment" the constitutionality of which the US Supreme Court will eventually decide.

The woman who was killed on September 23 rd 2010, Tresa Lewis, was aged around 45 and by all accounts seemed to be the victim of circumstances. Her mental abilities were extremely restricted and even the Court found that she had an IQ of around 70 making her a prime candidate for defence under the "diminished respomsibility" condition. Yet the Court found her guilty, awarded her the capital punishment and even theGovernor did not intervene to stop her excecution. I think the justice was seriously compromised in this particular case.

The facts are simple. Tresa Lewis was married to Julian for the second time and her husband had a son and both had good insurance policies to their credit. Apparently at the instigation of Mathew  Shallenberger and his accomplice Rodney Fuller, Tresa Lewis allowed both these men to enter her house on October 2, 2002 and the husband and step son were shot dead. At first the woman and her accomplices made it appear as ifthe killing had taken place during a break in and robbery. Shallenberger who actually killed the two men was give only life in prison and he subsequently killed himself.

When it is clear that Tresa Lewis did not pull the trigger and her possessedonly extremely limited moral and intellectual ability, I wonder on what grounds the death penalty was imposed. There is no doubt that she facilitated the crime but she did not actually carry out the killing and therefore under the law she cannot be guilty of a capital offence.


 




Comments (Page 2)
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Oct 18, 2010

As Daiwa put it" it is arrogant on the part of anyone questioning the judiscial process.

Nice try.  Not what I said.  Reading comprehension has never been one of your strong points, Bahu.

One can certainly 'question' the judicial process.  You didn't, just the result.  You want to debate the virtues of the Iranian 'judicial process' versus the US judicial process, have at it.

on Oct 18, 2010

On the issue of the state taking or arrogating to itself the right to taker life of a young, healthy human being evryone has an opinion-- yopu cannot say that it is arrogant or "speaking for the world". I only say that we were shocked.

He said it was arrogant of you to presume to know more than the 12 jurors, and I agree.  You can definitely disagree with the verdict and sentence, but you cannot authoritatively speak to the evidence (which you want to do with your feigned outrage).  There was no arrogance about being outraged, or even about speaking for the world (to the comment you made, no one has made a statement about your authority in that case, just the misogynist attitude of you and the rest of the world.

on Oct 18, 2010

CharlesCS
Had this person been a man and attempted to kill his wife, would that 2 point difference be seen in the same manner?

Yes

CharlesCS

Would this had caused a shock wave as well?

 

Yes

CharlesCS

Would the IQ test be considered unreliable as well?

Yes

CharlesCS

What is it that they call this? Double standards?

No

 

on Oct 18, 2010

CharlesCS
comment 12
Had this person been a man and attempted to kill his wife, would that 2 point difference be seen in the same manner?

Yes

Then why was it not?  At least by our resident internationist.  It happened 2 years ago, so not like it was ancient history.

Or are you saying in your opinion?  IN which case, I agree.

on Oct 18, 2010

I'm confused by that comment.  What happened two years ago?

on Oct 18, 2010

CharlesCS
comment 12
Had this person been a man and attempted to kill his wife, would that 2 point difference be seen in the same manner?

Yes

 

Not likely as when it comes to men, these types of situations are considered more likely to happen. When was the last time you heard of spousal abuse referring to a woman beating her man? Rarely.

CharlesCS
comment 12

Would this had caused a shock wave as well?



Yes

Funny, these issues happen from time to time and I barely hear any uproar about it.

CharlesCS
comment 12

Would the IQ test be considered unreliable as well?

Yes

I doubt it, men can't even look at women without their own women throwing a fit, i doubt a test like this one would be argued as unreliable if a man was involved.

In the eyes of most women, from personal experience, men are guilty till proved innocent.

CharlesCS
comment 12

What is it that they call this? Double standards?

No

Really? What ever Basmas. I need not to argue this point, there's enough proof everywhere to fill the Grand Canyon.

on Oct 18, 2010

Basmas
I'm confused by that comment.  What happened two years ago?

A man (NC I believe this time) of about the same IQ was put to death.  yet neither Bahu or "the rest of the world" screamed, so that indicates your statement is false.  Unless, as I qualified, that was your opinion, and not a statement directed in support of the OP.

on Oct 18, 2010

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4657897.stm

male case from 2005 that hit UK mainstream press

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/04/texas-execution-mental-disability-iq

2009 male case that hit UK mainstream press

Both caused complaints at the time

on Oct 19, 2010

It was barbaric to sentence a woman to be stoned to death, hence the vast international outcry. Which was massive compared to the comments about this case
ers from 'diminished capacity' no matter their IQ

. Ted Kaczynski comes to mind. I agree. That is part of my dilemma. I think that anyone who plans a murder (and therefore is hardly remorseful - except about being caught) has mental problems already.

 

The actualkiller got life in Jail;, but this woman was put to death. I think that the IQ level cannot be dismissed as some of you do as a piece of trivia. Her defence Coucel coulod hjave appealed on the basis of that.

 

\Ted, I think he was the mathematics Ph D from Berkley, but he was not put to death. He is still in Jail though hr sent bombs by post.

on Oct 19, 2010

Basmas
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4657897.stm

male case from 2005 that hit UK mainstream press

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/04/texas-execution-mental-disability-iq

2009 male case that hit UK mainstream press

Both caused complaints at the time

Atkins was never executed, and while Woods was, neither story would be what I would call "complaint" in the foreign press.  They are simply news stories.  Indeed, I am unaware of the "world wide" controversy surrounding the latest until Bahu decided he was spokesman for the world.

p.s. It was the Woods story I was thinking of, just got the wrong state.  My apologies.

on Oct 19, 2010

There was controversy at least in the UK.  The issue was dicussed in most of the main UK presses, Radio, written and TV.

on Oct 19, 2010

But there was no where near the amount of dicussion compared to the Iranian woman, and indeed the hassle that followed afterwards for her lawers and his family

on Oct 19, 2010

Basmas
There was controversy at least in the UK.  The issue was dicussed in most of the main UK presses, Radio, written and TV.

I will take your word for it, but the links do not indicate a great deal of debate, just reporting of the news.  Indeed, it may be as bad as it was with Teresa, but then until Bahu chimed in, I had not heard more than the normal amount of criticism of the "barbaric colonialists".

on Oct 19, 2010

So now you're against equality for women?

on Oct 19, 2010

comment addressed and who and with which evidence?

5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last