This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Democracy falters and Monnarchy wilts
Published on February 14, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
An impoverished, violent and at time prophetic journalist of the !9th century once wrote:Events in History appesr twice; first time a tragedy and second time a farce. This statement is more true of Nepal than it was on the !8th Brumaire of Napoleon Bonaparte.
Three years ago there was a strage coup in Nepal. The entire Royal Family was shot dead and the blame was thrown on Prince Dependra the heir to the throne. The killing of the entire family meant that the pattern of succession changed from the family ofBirendtra to King Gyanendra and his prince of darknessParas. The people of Nepal freely admit that masked gunmen weraring the disguise of Prince Depenra were resopnsible for the Palace Massacre which brought the present king to power. The new king does not enjoy public support and the Monarcy is more unpopular now than it ever was. A small elite of warrior Ranas have now seized power after dismissing the Government of Sher Bahadur Deuba.
The likely fallout of this farce is the further intesification of the Moaist uprising. So far the Royal Nepal Army has been disciplined but disaffection is spreading in the ranks. The Moaists are following the strategy of giving redistributed agricultural land to soldiers who died in the conflict with the Moaist gureillas. This tactic is proving so successful that the recent strike called by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) wasalmost total in most parts of the country. They were even able to show their support in Khatmandu where the soldiers were out in strength.
This year will be acrucial year for Nepal. The rate at which the Maoists are taking over the countryside and fedistributing the land suggests that before the end of this year they will be strong enough to storm the Capital. The monarchy stands discredited and isolated and when the hour comes it wil wilt.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 14, 2005
Okay.... And we're supposed to care , why?
on Feb 14, 2005
Okay.... And we're supposed to care , why?


Are you always such a bigoted little bitch?
on Feb 14, 2005
Great article, Bahu. I'm sorry to see the filthy ignorant American Dr. Miller has smeared yet another interesting article with such an uncivilized comment. He's probably jealous of your superior command of the English language.

David St. Hubbins



on Feb 14, 2005
Okay.... And we're supposed to care , why?


Are you always such a bigoted little bitch?


Okay jerk! "bitch" try the other way. And ask anyone here....yes I'm always a "bastard".
on Feb 15, 2005
I do not know why bad languaGE AND VIBES INHERE when two of the rtegular users hit out against eac h other. Think there is more to life than name calling anf abuse. Kindly do not do such things.

Why shouls one care. USA has procalimed Democracy as its foreign policy credo and thats why.
on Feb 15, 2005
Bahu,

I do not know why bad languaGE AND VIBES INHERE


Neither do I. Please ignore it. Not all here are like this.

I find it appalling that the International Community has not stepped in to help with the situation in Nepal. Realistically, Nepal has very little in terms of material worth, which is probably why they've not offered any assistance. If only we Westerners placed as much value on spiritual worth, then Nepal would be very rich indeed.

Cheers,

Maso
on Feb 15, 2005
Realistically, Nepal has very little in terms of material worth, which is probably why they've not offered any assistance. If only we Westerners placed as much value on spiritual worth, then Nepal would be very rich


You may be right about material wealth, but land locked Nepal has certain strategic implications for South Asia and China. In any event if the Maoists overun Nepal and set up a Pol Pot type of government there which the brutal peasant rebels of Nepal are capable of doing, then the world has aproblem on its hands. It is better to nip this problem in the bud, as the collapse of the Monarchy is only a matter of time.
on Feb 15, 2005
You may be right about material wealth, but land locked Nepal has certain strategic implications for South Asia and China. In any event if the Maoists overun Nepal and set up a Pol Pot type of government there which the brutal peasant rebels of Nepal are capable of doing, then the world has aproblem on its hands. It is better to nip this problem in the bud, as the collapse of the Monarchy is only a matter of time.


If this happens the west will probably step in. If America were to do it right now you and alot of others would accuse uss of nation building. You can't have it both ways.
on Apr 21, 2006
I put up this blog more than a year back. Now my prediction is coming true.
on Apr 21, 2006
The Moaists are following the strategy of giving redistributed agricultural land to soldiers who died in the conflict with the Moaist gureillas.


you must mean they're redistributing land to the soldiers' families. dead men till no vales.

Now my prediction is coming true


what's the relationship between the cpn-maoists and the 7-party alliance?
on Apr 21, 2006

what's the relationship between the cpn-maoists and the 7-party alliance?


What you have said is insightful because the 7 part Alliance will eventually fally to a Communist backed putch. Right now the Maoists are supporting the call for democtracy, but once Monachy falls, within a matter of weeks if not days, then they are in a fine position to take over the country.
on Apr 21, 2006
the 7 part Alliance will eventually fally to a Communist backed putch. Right now the Maoists are supporting the call for democtracy, but once Monachy falls, within a matter of weeks if not days, then they are in a fine position to take over the country.


i get the sense there would be little reason for the cpn-m to exist except to counter the monarchy. could they hope for better than an unpopular tryanical king like gyanendra?

i wonder how the nepalese will react should they suddenly find themselves in a country without any king at all.
on Apr 21, 2006
Okay.... And we're supposed to care , why?


Are you always such a bigoted little bitch?


Are you always such an ignorant jerk? That's Mr. "Bastard", to you!
on Apr 21, 2006
That's Mr. "Bastard", to you!


you realize you said pretty much the exact same thing in response to that comment when it was originally posted...in february 2005.

i'm thinkin it might more accurately be mr. redundant bastard to whomever.
on Apr 21, 2006
That's Mr. "Bastard", to you!


you realize you said pretty much the exact same thing in response to that comment when it was originally posted...in february 2005.

i'm thinking it might more accurately be mr. redundant bastard to whomever.


Me a redundant bastard???? How about you Mr. Oh so Irrelevant?
2 Pages1 2