This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Some Questions for Tony Blair
Published on July 11, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
The bomb attaks in London took place when Londoners were going about their normal work. The tube trains were probably targetted because of their symbolic value and also provided an easy soft target. This was an attack on civillian non combatants and there fore needs to be condemned in the strongest possible terms. This kind of terrorist attackis not onlo bad for Islam but if it is done in the name of Islam damages the very cause for which it was done in the first place. LIke the Madrid Train bombing this event was also designed to influence British public opinion. One unfortunate consequence of this terror attack has been the physical and mental harassment of Asian minority in London, Birmingham, and other places. The entire Asian Community in England has withnone voice condemned the attacks and hence there is no justification for attacks on Asians. It is unfortunate that non white minorities are being targetted in England as reprissal for the Tube Train Bombings. Tony Blair and his Home Secretary must provide adeqyuate security to Asians living in Britain. Three religious houses have also been attacked. The British public should not play into the hands of the perpetrators of these atacks by becoming vengeful and anti Asian.

The real reason behind the attacks is clear:The involvement of Tony Blair and his Governemnt in Iraq. The Spanish people voted out the Government that took them to war in Iraq, the British people reelected that government.

Thre are some reports that the British Government is likely to ask Australia to stand in for the UK after a pull out from Britain.. The strikes have provaked a debate for the first time in England over the wisdom of being involved in Iraq.

The graceful speech of Ken Livingston, the Mayor of London, was the only decent response from a high profile public figure in England. Tony Blair was his usual arrogant self wihout a trace of sorrow or remorse.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jul 11, 2005
"The real reason behind the attacks is clear:The involvement of Tony Blair and his Governemnt in Iraq. The Spanish people voted out the Government that took them to war in Iraq, the British people reelected that government.

Thre are some reports that the British Government is likely to ask Australia to stand in for the UK after a pull out from Britain.. The strikes have provaked a debate for the first time in England over the wisdom of being involved in Iraq.

The graceful speech of Ken Livingston, the Mayor of London, was the only decent response from a high profile public figure in England. Tony Blair was his usual arrogant self wihout a trace of sorrow or remorse. "


There's a stark comparison between the first and last half of your article. It's really, really sad to me that you would take a situation like this and say "See, that's what you get for re-electing Blair's government."

Before you take issue with the interpretation, look at what you said:

"The real reason behind the attacks is clear:The involvement of Tony Blair and his Governemnt in Iraq. The Spanish people voted out the Government that took them to war in Iraq, the British people reelected that government. "


Such a statement betrays the goodwill you offered when you condemned the attacks. It's akin to condemning a rape and then lambasting the woman for being promiscuous. NO ACTION taken by the British public or the British people speaks to the "reason" this was done. We can accept NO PROVOCATION for such an action, because to do so then lends to the idea that it had been provoked.

This is no different than people who say that the innocent killed in the Middle East "asked for it" by allowing terrorism to thrive, or that the Palestinian people deserve their suffering because they keep voting for Hamas. The reality is no one but the terrorists deserve destruction.

It saddens me that you don't offer condolences to the dead, but that what you are specifically concerned with how this hurts Islam and reiterating the sad idea that Britain somehow "asked for it."
on Jul 11, 2005
The real reason behind the attacks is clear:The involvement of Tony Blair and his Governemnt in Iraq.

The actual real reason is that there are people out there whose minds are so destroyed by hatred that they lash out every chance they get. Don't try to give excuses for terrorist acts because there arn't any.
Terrorism must be combatted and the guilty parties must be sought after, caught and punished for their barbaric deeds.
No excuse is justified for the horrors these animals perpetrate.
on Jul 11, 2005
I agree Bahu, there is no excuse for going after Asians in England because of this cowardly attack by the bacteria. They didn't do it, their leaders condemned it, and anyone who would attack an Asian in retaliation for the bombings were merely looking for an excuse to do a little terrorizing themselves.

As for the rest of your statement, I agree with Bakerstreet. Apparently to you, the rape victim must have deserved it, and as long as Blair is PM of England these attacks are somehow justified.
on Jul 11, 2005
The strikes have provaked a debate for the first time in England over the wisdom of being involved in Iraq.


This is misinformed rubbish! What do you mean "for the first time"? There has not only been debate, there has been a lot of activism in the UK both for and against the war from the get go. Didn't you notice the 1 million protestors in the middle of London in 2003?

It's quite clear what your agenda is - offering crocodile tears for the victims while seeking to 'justify' the attacks: "The real reason behind the attacks is clear... the British people reelected that government"

The British public should not play into the hands of the perpetrators of these atacks by becoming vengeful and anti Asian.


What kind of stupidity is this! There are a lot of Asians amongst the British public, in case you hadn't noticed. I'm sorry to hear "Three religious houses have" apparently "also been attacked". I hope that it goes no further, but frankly that doesn't suggest to me a wholesale spirit of vengeance from the British people, just the usual tiny number of hate-crazed racist nutters (ab)using an opportunity to do their thing.
on Jul 11, 2005
'Such a statement betrays the goodwill you offered when you condemned the attacks. It's akin to condemning a rape and then lambasting the woman for being promiscuous.'
Only if you choose to view the UK as the rape victim. Analyse the situation from an Iraqi perspective and it's not hard to perceive this less as a rape, and more as retribution FOR a rape.
on Jul 11, 2005
I bet you think Sept. 11 was because of Iraq also, right.
on Jul 11, 2005
'Such a statement betrays the goodwill you offered when you condemned the attacks. It's akin to condemning a rape and then lambasting the woman for being promiscuous.'
Only if you choose to view the UK as the rape victim. Analyse the situation from an Iraqi perspective and it's not hard to perceive this less as a rape, and more as retribution FOR a rape.


And just "why" should we view it from an Iraqi perspective? Are they the ones that died from the bomb blast? NO! The Brits are! Did the "Brits" kill women and children in Iraq? NO! But "someone" sure messed up a bunch of them in the British bombings!
on Jul 11, 2005
'Did the "Brits" kill women and children in Iraq? NO!'
Der - are you kidding?
on Jul 11, 2005
'Did the "Brits" kill women and children in Iraq? NO!'
Der - are you kidding?


No, but I guess you are! So by using your strange brand of logic, because some of our missles/bombs hit innocent people that we're next and we somehow like the Brits might deserve it??
on Jul 11, 2005
There is NO legitimate justification for the DELIBERATE and indescriminant targeting of CIVILIANS in such a cowardly attack. Period. Anyone who believes there that there is justification for these terrorist attacks is no better than the scum who carry them out. What the hell is wrong with you people?
on Jul 11, 2005

There is NO legitimate justification for the DELIBERATE and indescriminant targeting of CIVILIANS in such a cowardly attack. Period. Anyone who believes there that there is justification for these terrorist attacks is no better than the scum who carry them out. What the hell is wrong with you people?


Right On Mason!
on Jul 11, 2005

There is NO legitimate justification for the DELIBERATE and indescriminant targeting of CIVILIANS in such a cowardly attack. Period. Anyone who believes there that there is justification for these terrorist attacks is no better than the scum who carry them out. What the hell is wrong with you people


--Hmmm
on Jul 11, 2005
'So by using your strange brand of logic, because some of our missles/bombs hit innocent people that we're next and we somehow like the Brits might deserve it??'
WHAT? I can assume only that the voices told you this, drmiler, because I certainly didn't. Get well soon!
on Jul 12, 2005
can accept NO PROVOCATION for such an action, because to do so then lends to the idea that it had been provoked.


excuse is justified for the horrors these animals perpetrate.Bonus Rating: Trolling


long as Blair is PM of England these attacks are somehow justified.Bonus Rating: Trolling


First: I agree with Baker Street that my write up gives a veiled hint of an imprpper response. That was not my intention. I condemn that cowardly attack in the strongest possible terms because civillians and non combatants were killed. All I ask for is a similar recognition that civillians are being killed in other parts of the world in the name of the WAR against Terrorism. Please do not read this as a justification:my purpose is only to draw a parallel that when women and children are killed either in a terrorist attack in London or New York or by the insurgents and their adversaries the result is the same: HUMAN SUFFERING IN the MOST UNSPEAKABLE MANNER.

The world has not become safer after the invasion of Iraq. It has become far more unsafe.What pains me in this whole episode is that the British [pyblic are paying for the sins of Tony Blair and his war mongering cronies. Hence the statement about Spain. Again it is only a factual statement.
on Jul 12, 2005
I acknowledge that civilians are dying, because they are being used as human shields by the terrorists who hide among them. There is a difference between "killed" and "murdered", though, and one does not justify the other.

And no, I don't think you made it clear regarding your "factual statement". You didn't just say that the public was paying for the "sins" of Blair. You said:

"The Spanish people voted out the Government that took them to war in Iraq, the British people reelected that government. "


Which seems to say to me that they were asking for it. Contrary to what many might think, we shouldn't be led to the voting booth by threats. If so, we will live oppressed by nations half-a-world away, simply because they finance terrorist who impose their will on us.
2 Pages1 2