This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Where is the Presidency Heading
Published on November 1, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
In politics a week they say is a long time. George Bush II must be realising the truth of this cliche' during the course of the past week. First his handpicked nominee for the Supre Court had to withdraw herself from the race as even conservatives were beginning to sak questions about the quality of judicial discretion she possesses. The Democrats quick to draw blood, sought to acquire White House documents during the course of the confirmation hearings. This tactic or ploy is surely unconstitutional but there was very little pritest from the Excecutive Branch. It is stretching the point a bit too much to say that Whiote House i.e. in house madvice given by a counsel should be madfe available to the Judicial hearinngs. It is surely sign of a critically wounded Presidency that George Bush II decided to withdraw his candidate rather than force the issue.

The Karl Rove muck just wont go away. Today CNN's Woolf Blitzer interviewed Ambassador Wilson. I was struck by two points made by Wilson regarging the outing of his wife as a covert CIA operattive. First as a NOC (Non Offivial Cover), Valerie Plam had risked life and limb over two decades of service in order to penetrate the arcane world, a murky one too, of weapons proliferators, suppliers and prospective buyers of WMD. All her hard work was with callous cynical indifference set at rest in order to score a dubious political point. Fritzgerald, the Special Procecutor is right now only looking at the obstruction of justice angle, but he is surely not going to be stonewalled by the White House as American Law has been broken with impunity. Karl Rove may have been more fortunate than Libby, but the matter does not end there. The second point is more serious and pertains to the political use of intelligence assets. Wilson clealy believes that the documents used by the then Secretary of State, Colin Powell, tio make a case for the invasion of Iraq in the United Nations, were forged and the Bush Administration was aware of it. This demonstrates that the intelligence was cooked around the policy and one more proof of the perfidy of the regime occupying the White House.

So we are seeing a mortally wounded Adninistration and with every passing day the approval ratings is going down.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 02, 2005
"she has gone back to work at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., after a leave of absence; she has been photographed for Vanity Fair, snapped at the Tribeca Film Festival;"


There is a photo of her, undisguised, in this week's Newsweek.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Nov 02, 2005
It's interesting that if Plame was so "covert" that she had no problem posing for magazine covers.


"she has gone back to work at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., after a leave of absence; she has been photographed for Vanity Fair, snapped at the Tribeca Film Festival;"


My point is that no one would classify anything about her as covert now, in 2005.

It appears that you were impying that she considered herself covert at the time of the Vanity Fair article. She had already been identified and the story was already all over the news when that article came out.

Several people have implied that she blew her own identity by doing that Vanity Fair story, but that was long after reporters identified her in print with information they received from White House officials. I'm not going to get into whether that was a crime or not, I'm just pointing out that her identity was already widely known before that article. Therefore you can't use that story as proof to support your assertion that she was never "covert".
on Nov 02, 2005
It appears that you were impying that she considered herself covert at the time of the Vanity Fair article. She had already been identified and the story was already all over the news when that article came out.


The point is if she was so "covert", even if her name was "outed", posing for pictures for the MSM still isn't a very good idea.
on Nov 03, 2005
I suppose it is not any one's case that an undercover agent who happened to be married to a mman who stood his ground over the 13 offending words in Bush's state of the Union address should be exposed so that the report of her husband could be discredited. This behaviour on the part of the Bushmen rerveals a facet of the present administration that was long hidden:break the law with impuinity and if caught bluff and bluster your way out. I think it is deplorable that many should side with the offenders and bnot with the victim.
on Nov 03, 2005
I suppose it is not any one's case that an undercover agent who happened to be married to a mman who stood his ground over the 13 offending words in Bush's state of the Union address should be exposed so that the report of her husband could be discredited. This behaviour on the part of the Bushmen rerveals a facet of the present administration that was long hidden:break the law with impuinity and if caught bluff and bluster your way out. I think it is deplorable that many should side with the offenders and bnot with the victim.


Lets start with it was "16" words, not "13". And what I find deplorable is your inability to understand the plain fact that nobody outed anyone. Had Plame been outed believe me, Rove would have been indicted by the Grand Jury along with Libby. But he has NOT been! So what does that tell you? Tells me there was no crime committed in the first place. And I guess you don't read to well either. Plame was NOT a covert agent! Even her husband admits that much!
on Nov 03, 2005
It appears that you were impying that she considered herself covert at the time of the Vanity Fair article. She had already been identified and the story was already all over the news when that article came out.


Davad70: I don't know where Valerie Plame learned the laws and regulations concerning classified information, but the security briefings I went through made a few things very clear. One of which was, if you see classified information exposed in a public media, that does not give you the authority to talk openly on the subject... it is still classified.

If Valerie Plame was a covert agent then her name and identity as such could only be declassified (clearing her to openly discuss it) by the authority who classified the information in the first place. Not even covert agents are free to declassify their names or identity.

So, that leaves this fact glaring in our faces. Either the CIA (or the NSA... not sure which one grants such classifications) declassified her identity and cleared her to discuss it openly with Vanity Fair; She spoke with Vanity Fair without knowing the regulations concerning comprimised classified information; or she broke the law by discussing classified information with Vanity Fair (and others).... oh yeah, or the other option... her identity was never "covert" in the first place...
on Nov 03, 2005
But he has NOT been! So what does that tell you? Tells me there was no crime committed in the first place. And


It should be Not yet indicted. The Jury is still out as far as Karl Rove is concerned. Do not proclaim victiory as yet. It may be a trifler premature.
on Nov 03, 2005
But he has NOT been! So what does that tell you? Tells me there was no crime committed in the first place. And


It should be Not yet indicted. The Jury is still out as far as Karl Rove is concerned. Do not proclaim victiory as yet. It may be a trifler premature.


You guys never give up do you? What will it take for you to see the light. This investigation has been ongoing for "2 YEARS" and as of yet they are unable to find evidence of the wrong doing that ya'll say Rove did!
on Nov 03, 2005
I suppose it is not any one's case that an undercover agent who happened to be married to a mman who stood his ground over the 13 offending words in Bush's state of the Union address should be exposed so that the report of her husband could be discredited. This behaviour on the part of the Bushmen rerveals a facet of the present administration that was long hidden:break the law with impuinity and if caught bluff and bluster your way out. I think it is deplorable that many should side with the offenders and bnot with the victim.


Wilson has already been shown to be a fraud. He didn't provide any facts against the Bush administration.
on Nov 04, 2005
Had this scandal broken out at the time of the Campaign then the result in Nov 2004 may have been different. That is beside tthe point.

The fact is that a bunker mentality has now set in and the neoconmen are drawing the wagons in a circle in order to defend themselves. Scooter Libby, Tom DeLay and the mounting casulities in Iraq and the impending clash with Iran and Syria all show that we can expect more trouble both on the legal and international front.
2 Pages1 2