This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Why the US-India Nuclear Deal Spells Disaster for the World
Published on March 15, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
In his extremely perceptive bvook India's Nuclear Bomb, George Perkovitich has documented in telling detail the long and covert road to nuclearization in India. Right fro the start of her nuclear research in the early i950,s the civillian uses of nuclear technology has only been a fascade for carrying out a covert programme of weaponisation. The sanctimonious humbug that a developing country needs nuclear energy for meeting its ever increasing demands for electricity was first trotted out by Indian leaders in 1994 when the country exploded a nuclear device of 18 kiloton. The fact of the matter is that the p,lutonium fro that explosion came from the Tarapur Plant that had been supplied with nuclear fuel by the US. By not signing the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and boldly exploding a Nuclear Bomb, India demonstrated to the weorld that the rhetoric of non proliferation not withstandinng, the world will quickly forget the brazen challenge. In fact now evidence has come to light that many of the components for the nuclear establishments in India, particularly dual use technologies governed by stringent non proliferation rules have been willfully breached by India in her haste and anxiety to acquire nuclear weapons. South Africa eems to have been the most favored countries for the export of dual use technologies in complete and total violation of US domestic laws.

In this context the Congress must ponder over a number of questions. The Nuclear Deal with the USA will violate US obligations as a weapon states signatory to the NPT. As a weapon state the US had given a formal comigftttment to the world that ir will not assist other nations from acquiring the Bomb. By agreeing to supply Nuclear fuel to India the US is violating its commitmnet under the NPT. Secon, it will make the US policy of containing countries like Iran and North Korea extremely difficult. In fact what India has done is far far worse than Iran. For nearly 50 years we were only hearing the rhetoric of peaceful uses of nuclear energy fro Indian leaders while all the time they were making the Bomb. As far as Iran is concerned, it argues that the NPT does not prohibit the full fuel cycle, and in this interpretations the Iranians are correct. Of course they hid a part of their research, but the fact of the matter is that India pulled wool over the eyes of the whole world and now the Bush Administration is legitimising this gross violatuion of its own policy.

Comments
on Mar 15, 2006
"As a weapon state the US had given a formal comigftttment to the world that ir will not assist other nations from acquiring the Bomb. "


They already have the bomb. We can't help them acquire what they already have. I find it odd that you would oppose something that the IAEA and Mohammed ElBaradei himself would boost non-proliferation efforts.

"The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog has welcomed a nuclear agreement between the US and India.

International Atomic Energy Agency chief (IAEA) Mohammed ElBaradei said it would boost non-proliferation efforts. -Link"


It won't make dealing with Iran or North Korea any more difficult. Iran will stop what they are doing, or they'll face serious consequences. North Korea can sit and eat their nuclear weapons and be a shunned, poverty-plagued, paranoid nation.

You seem to think that the problem with these nations is nuclear weapons. Are you surprised that peaceful nations get more leeway than nations that spew hate at the rest of the world? I don't like the idea of Iran or North Korea having bb-guns, and I would vote happily to prevent them from possessing them so long as they are hateful threats to their neighbors.

I'm sure the book you mention stated that India actually entered into their first nuclear test in 1974, and Pakistan was at it at the same time. It should have also mentioned that India stepped back from its nuclear program for several years until it became evident that nothing was going to prevent Pakistan from getting weapons.

If you can morally equate the regime in Tehran with that in New Delhi, then there's really no way we can have a meeting of minds about this. Iran regularly calls for the destruction of Israel. To me, there is a vast difference.
on Mar 15, 2006
Again, it looks like the gun control debate. Opponents say that guns are bad, no matter why you own them, so no one should own them. Whether the criminal is using them to kill innocents, or law-abiding people are using them for legal uses, the wrong is equal since guns are owned on both sides.

Nuclear weapons in India are used to balance those in Pakistan and China. Iran isn't interested in balance. They are calling for the destruction of Israel. When India calls for the destruction of Pakistan, I will feel more inclined to agree with you on the difficulties this deal will create.
on Mar 15, 2006

In this context the Congress must ponder over a number of questions. The Nuclear Deal with the USA will violate US obligations as a weapon states signatory to the NPT. As a weapon state the US had given a formal commitment to the world that ir will not assist other nations from acquiring the Bomb. By agreeing to supply Nuclear fuel to India the US is violating its commitment under the NPT. Secondly, it will make the US policy of containing countries like Iran and North Korea extremely difficult. In fact what India has done is far far worse than Iran. For nearly 50 years we were only hearing the rhetoric of peaceful uses of nuclear energy fro Indian leaders while all the time they were making the Bomb. As far as Iran is concerned, it argues that the NPT does not prohibit the full fuel cycle, and in this interpretations the Iranians are correct. Of course they hid a part of their research, but the fact of the matter is that India pulled wool over the eyes of the whole world and now the Bush Administration is legitimizing this gross violation of its own policy.


I'm sorry but you "obviously" do not know what you're talking about! Read below and educate yourself before you make any more ignorant statements. And while I'm at it?....Get a spell-checker and use it.



Fact Sheet: United States and India: Strategic Partnership




"We have an ambitious agenda with India. Our agenda is practical. It builds on a relationship that has never been better. India is a global leader, as well as a good friend. ... My trip will remind everybody about the strengthening of an important strategic partnership. We'll work together in practical ways to promote a hopeful future for citizens in both our nations."

President George W. Bush, February 22, 2006

CIVIL NUCLEAR COOPERATION: The United States and India have reached an historic agreement on civil nuclear cooperation. The agreement addresses India's surging energy needs for its growing economy. This will also ease the burden on other countries as the world's energy needs continue to rise.

The U.S. and India have agreed to pursue civil nuclear cooperation to allow India to cooperate and trade in this key area.
India has agreed to take steps that will bring it into the international non-proliferation mainstream, including placing its civilian nuclear facilities and programs under IAEA safeguards and adhering to the guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime.
The U.S.-India strategic partnership is rooted in shared values and is broad in nature and scope, with our two countries working together on global issues, including expanding economic freedom and democracy; ensuring plentiful sources of clean, safe, and reliable energy; protecting security; supporting innovation and technological advances; and promoting public health.

ECONOMY: The United States and India are expanding cooperation to enhance job creation and economic growth; support economic reform and liberalization; develop a bilateral business climate supportive of trade and investment; and improve market access for goods and services.

Trade: Over the last five years, U.S. exports to India have more than doubled, helping to create better-paying jobs in the United States. The United States and India agree that trade is essential to promoting global economic growth, development, freedom, and prosperity. Both countries are committed to completing the WTO Doha Development Agenda before the end of 2006.
Investment: The United States and India welcomed the report of the U.S.-India CEO Forum and agreed to work on its recommendations through the Economic Dialogue; endorsed the efforts of the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum to reduce barriers to trade and investment; agreed to hold a high-level public-private investment summit in 2006; and are continuing the dialogue on various issues, including further liberalization of investment restrictions, regulatory transparency, dispute settlement, and reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade.
Agriculture: The United States and India have launched the Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture to link universities, technical institutions, and businesses to support high-priority joint agriculture education, research, and capacity-building projects including biotechnology.
DEMOCRACY: Building on their common values and interests, the United States and India affirmed their joint commitment to promote freedom and democracy and assist countries in transition. Effective democracies with governments accountable to the people are the best means of ensuring long-term stability and prosperity.

The United States and India will work together to support the growth and development of vibrant civil societies, including independent media and non-governmental organizations, in countries that seek such assistance.
ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT: The United States and India are working together to help meet India's rising demand for energy by looking at new technologies to produce clean, safe, and reliable energy.

FutureGen: India will join the FutureGen international partnership which will work to create a zero-emissions coal-fired power plant, enabling greater use of coal in an environmentally sustainable way.
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER): India has joined the United States, Russia, the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China as an ITER member.
Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: The United States and India, together with Australia, China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, will work on practical ways to improve energy security, improve air quality, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in ways that foster economic growth.
SECURITY: The United States and India are building the foundation of a durable defense relationship that will continue to support our common strategic and security interests.

Maritime Security Cooperation: The United States and India are committed to a comprehensive cooperative effort to ensure a secure maritime domain.
Counterterrorism: The United States and India are jointly expanding the scope of our counterterrorism cooperation, including work on bioterrorism and cybersecurity.
Military Logistics Support: The United States and India will soon sign an agreement to facilitate mutual logistic support during combined training, exercises, and disaster relief operations.
Defense Trade: The United States reaffirmed its goal to help meet India's defense needs and to provide the important technologies and capabilities that India seeks.
Non-proliferation: Both countries support efforts to limit the spread of enrichment and reprocessing technologies and also support the conclusion of a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty.
INNOVATIVE AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES: The United States and India are working together to support the creation of innovative, dynamic, knowledge-based economies.

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): The United States is funding IPR training programs to strengthen enforcement and patent examination, as a vibrant IPR regime is critical to the promotion of a creative, technologically advanced economy.
Science: The United States and India established and co-fund the $30 million Bi-National Science and Technology Commission to generate collaborative partnerships in science and technology.
Space: The United States and India have agreed to continue exploring further cooperation in civil space, including areas such as space exploration, satellite navigation, and earth science. In addition, agreements are being completed that will allow for the launch of U.S. satellites and satellites containing U.S. components by Indian launch vehicles.
PUBLIC HEALTH: The United States and India are cooperating to expand efforts to combat and prevent Avian Influenza and HIV/AIDS.

Avian Influenza: The United States and India agreed to expand bilateral efforts on avian influenza by, among other things, reaching out to the private sector, developing regional communications strategies, and planning an in-region containment and response exercise. India will host the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza meeting in 2007.
HIV/AIDS: Last July, President Bush and Prime Minister Singh agreed to further strengthen cooperation on HIV/AIDS by leveraging resources, knowledge, and expertise. Since then:
The United States increased funding in FY2006 for HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment programs to $29.3 million.

We have established an Indo-U.S. Corporate Sector Fund for HIV/AIDS, which is a partnership among U.S. and Indian businesses to fight AIDS. Six companies have already pledged a total of $1.2 million to the Fund.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has given approval to 13 generic antiretroviral drugs produced by Indian pharmaceutical companies. These drugs can now be purchased as part of the President's Emergency Plan for HIV/AIDS for use around the world.
on Mar 16, 2006
They already have the bomb. We can't help them acquire what they already have. I find it odd that you would oppose something that the IAEA and Mohammed ElBaradei himself would boost non-proliferation efforts.


The IAEA does not approve or ratify this deal. In fact the US will help India negotiate an India specific protocol which will certainlu undermine the non proliferation regime. In fact even before the ink has dried on this agreement the Russian President Putin has agreed to supply nulear fuel to Tarapur in complete violation of US standing in the Nuclear Supply Group. I hope the Congress hunkers down this Deal.
on Mar 16, 2006
The IAEA does not approve or ratify this deal. In fact the US will help India negotiate an India specific protocol which will certainlu undermine the non proliferation regime. In fact even before the ink has dried on this agreement the Russian President Putin has agreed to supply nulear fuel to Tarapur in complete violation of US standing in the Nuclear Supply Group. I hope the Congress hunkers down this Deal


I guess that you do not read very well, if at all. Here is a section of reply #3 that states very plainly how wrong you are.


India has agreed to take steps that will bring it into the international non-proliferation mainstream, including placing its civilian nuclear facilities and programs under IAEA safeguards and adhering to the guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime.
The U.S.-India strategic partnership is rooted in shared values and is broad in nature and scope, with our two countries working together on global issues, including expanding economic freedom and democracy; ensuring plentiful sources of clean, safe, and reliable energy; protecting security; supporting innovation and technological advances; and promoting public health.