This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Why the King must stay
Published on April 22, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
The great Florentine humanist, historian and statesman Nicolo Machiavelli in his The Prince argued that a statesman must instill fear: It is better to be feared than loved. Using an animal metaphor he said it was better to be a lion than a fox. His words of wisdom should ring a bell in the minds of all those who are following the tragic events in Nepal. Right now the Seven Party Alliance is beseiging the Singh Darbar where the royal palace ios located. The king Gyanedra has responded by ordering his troops to open fire and about 7 civilians have been killed. The situation in Nepal is tense and the king has realised that the victory for the Seven Party Alliance at this particular moment will be only a phyrric victory, because the Maoists who are watching all this unfold from the sidelines will quickly movein to feast on the remains after the fall of the monarchy. Unfortunately the King without realising the gravity of the situation has handed over a political and moral victory to the Communists who are very much active behind the scene and are just waiting to grab political power. The Seven Party Alliance has not shown the wisdom and political sagacity by which Nepal can be democratised within the framework of a constitutional monarchy.

The King has conceded too little too late. Had he made these concessions a monmth back he could have saved the Kingdom. Now his concessions are looked upon as signs of weakness and we know verywell how maoists behave when they see signs of weakness. They just raise the political bar too high and start making impossible demands. Unfortunately the US policy in the region did not recognise the threat posed by the Maoists and the US joined the chorus of voiced demanding democaracy. India which shares a long border with Nepal made things more difficult by imposing an arms embargo. The Maoists were getting arms from China and Burma while the Royal Nepal Army had to face the communists with.303 rifles.

Ever since the king and his son had the former kind Birendra, Queen Aiswarya and the entire family killed in a Palace coup for wich a Crown Price was made to take the rap, Nepal has been lurching from one crisis to another. The King should now realise that it is easy to arrane assasinationsd but difficult to sit on a throne acquired through bloodshed.

Comments
on Apr 22, 2006
which seven parties comprise the alliance?

how will china deal with a maoist government on its border? i'm not so sure they'd wanna have mao's ghost wandering around so close and outta control.
on Apr 22, 2006
how will the chinese deal with a maoist government on its border?Bonus Rating: Trolling Insightful


The Chinese will not and cannot abandon the Mapists as they providetoe hold to destabalise the region. It is only a matter of time before Nepal falls to the Communist rebels.
on Apr 22, 2006
sorry...i edited my post while you were responding to it.

do you really think china wants to see the revival of a maoist cult and risk the possibility it might spread over the border?
on Apr 22, 2006
the disease of Mao, continues to be more Than just an annoyance, would it not be just to have the chinese get reinfected so long after Mao died.
on Apr 22, 2006
INteresting take on the troubles.  I tend to agree iwth Kingbee on this one, but I guess things are headed for a climax fast enough.  So we will see about the 7 parties, the King, or the Moaists.
on Apr 24, 2006
Personally speaking the Seven Party Alliance should exclude the Maoists from the political process and allow the Royal Nepal Army to finish off the rebellion. Only then can Nepal become a democratic state. It is more likeluy that the CPN (maoists) will allow the & Party Alliance to topple the king and then the armed bandits of the CP of Nepal will topple the so called democratic government and install a peoples's democracy.
on Apr 27, 2006
Now an update. As I predicted the King blinked and has appointed Girija Prasad Koirala the Prime Minister. The fact is that the people of Nepal do not want Monarchy and hence the word for Democracy is being changed from Prajatantra with its conotation of "subject" to Loktantra which has the essential meaning of peoples rule. The Monarch had hoped that the Seven Party Alliance will let him have a say in the running of the Administration or at least provide him a constitutional role. The Maoists will not allow the Monarchy to continue and there is every fear that once the Monarchy isd overthrown then it will easy for the Maoists to seize power as they control the roards leading to Khatmandu.

Now the Army. The Army is essentially loyal to the Monarchy and is hardly in a position to take on the Maoists. The armsembarge, as I have argued elsewhere, has severely weakened the Army. They will not succeed agasinst the Maoists and the Army will just stand by as the Maoists imposed what can be called a Salami Solution on Nepal. The Army will not defenf the regime of the Seven Party Alliance and so the transition to a Peoples' Democracy is certain, only a matter of time.
on Apr 27, 2006
This seems to be doom for Nepal, imho. Communist states always take root in the ashes of the previous government, and seem to thrive where monarchy failed. Whether they do it by force or by undermining democratic rule, I think the puppet status of Nepal will be assured.
on Apr 27, 2006
Communist states always take root in the ashes of the previous government,


i'm under the impression there are a number of 'communist' parties in nepal (leninist, leninist-marxist, etc.). are any of them members of the allied 7 parties or otherwise represented by that group? i've tried to determine the answer myself, without much success (i really haven't had a lotta time to devote to it tho).
on Apr 27, 2006
are any of them members of the allied 7 parties or otherwise represented by that group?


an article i found online today indicated the nepal communist party (uml)--united marxist-leninist?--and the nepalese democratic congressional party are two of the seven (altho it also seemed to refer to the latter as the nepalese democratic parliamentary party...so who knows?).

as noted earlier, i believe there are at least four active communist parties in nepal. i don't know their relative sizes or import however.
on May 01, 2006
It is interesting how the Seven Party Alliance has already put in place the Maoists agenda: First, it wanted the Chief Justice of Nepal to swear in the Prime Minister not the King. Second, the PM refused to take the oath as member of the Rajyaprishad, a kind of Privy Council. Third, the Maoists have given them only 3 months time. This time around the Seven Party Allinace will fall to the Maoists onslought.