This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
And Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free
Published on June 3, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
The word Haditha is soon becoming a verb from its present location in the English language as a noun. Whenever the atrocities of the Occupation Forces were being highlighted in the Arab and Non Arab media, the immediate reaction of some self righteous individuals has been to dismiss the charges on the grounds that "we are too civilised to do all that". "Our Marines are too benign to indulge in such acts". "Our Governemnt is too upright not to indulge in cover ups" etc etc. The fact s are that the USA invaded Iraq without any reason on the pretext of the Weapons of Mass Destruction and having conquered the country tried its hand at setting the Sunnis an\gainst the Shiaas and the result is a full blown Insurgency which has careened out of control. Somewhere along the way are the inconvienient details of Abu Gahraib I and II, the use of Cluster Bombs on civilian targets, the wilfull destruction of a whole city-- Fallujah-- in the name of pacification and now Haditha. This catalogue of horrors can go on, but we owe it to the innocent dead to pause and reflect on Haditha and what it represents.

On November 19, 2005 a Marine outfit known as the Kilo Company belonging to the 3rd Battalion of the Ist Regiment was on patrol on the streets of Haditha. The policy of Rumsfeltf of not rotating the troops has been a factor since many of the marines were on their 3rd tour of duty in Iraq. Haditha is a small farming village/town along the banks of the Euphrates and is located 200 km north of the Capital. Though not part of the infamous Sunni Triangle, Haditha has become a centre of the insurgency against the occupying forces and here both the Sunnis and Shiaas have more or less a joint front. The flat mud roofed houses do not afford much protection. Of course, as in any Insurgency, there are attacks on the US forces. This Kilo Company had already acquired a degree of notoriety for its earlier counter insurgency.

Around 7:30 in the morning a bomb exploded on a street that was being patrolled by US marines in 5 humvees. All these humvees have had their undercarriage/chasis reinforced by armour plating. However, the Iraqi Insurgents use an IED which uses the conventional anti tank shell and is modified by the use of a pressure detonating device which means that when the vibrations of the approaching convoy reached the IED its charge is activated and its timer is usually set to blow up after 60 to 75 seconds. Most of the American casualities have been as a result of the IEDs. In societies which have turned against the invader such planning cannot take place without the approval/tacit support of the population. Afterall did not the Great Helmsman say that "insurgents are like fish in water".

The explosion killed one marine on the spot and injured several. What happened next is the stuff horrors are made of. The marine Terrazas was the one killed. A taxi cruising nearby was the first tatget. The Kilo Company opened fire and killed 5 young men in the taxi. The story put out by the Marines aftwer the Hadirah Massacre was that the young men in the taxi triggered the explosion. In the previous paragraph I have explained the mechanism of such IEDs. so the young men travelling in the Taxi were absolutely innocent.

After killing the young men in the car the Marines divided into two groups one went on a rampage while the other stood by and watched and helped in the cleanup and coverup that followed. The photos submitted by the marines do not show any of the dodies that bore the marks of bullet injuries. Only the buildings and the damaged humvees were shown. However, an amateur photographer took video rtecordings of the entire episode which has clearly brought out the fact of the cold blodded killings.One marine from the silent group took out his digital cameram and took some pictures and it is not clear whether these pictures were seen by the superior officers.

The Marines then put out the story that after the IED explosion there was firing from the roof tops. The houses in that part of Iraq as I have stated earlier are flat roofed and do not provide any protection. The local population has testified that the only firing wwas from the side of the Marine Unit.

The Kilo Company moved into 4 homes and a total of 24 men, women and choldren were shot in cold blood. Not a single one of then was a terrorist or even a militant insurgent. In fact the initial reaction of the higher ups in the US military when confronted with the facts of the Haditha Incident was to dismiss it as Al Qaeda Propaganda. The US Department of Defence now claims that it learnt about this Massacre only in Febuary 2006. Like in the case of the Abu Gharaib Affair, the attempt that is now being made is to fix the responsiblity for the Massacre on some junior officers and men and procalim that the political leadership was not complicit in the acrime. If this be the case then how come Saddam Hussain is being teied for war crimes when in fact he ordered only the excecution of the prisoners after due process. The Haditha Massacre has compromised US ability to hand out any punishment to Saddam because the conduct in the post Saddam period in not different from what existed earlier.

Now the coverup. The higherup in the Marine Command knew about the Haditha Massacre and decided to falsify the facts in order to make the whole thing seem like a fire fight with the Insurgents and the death of the civilians be passed off, yes, as "collateral damage". The Kilo Comany could not expalin why the young men in the car had no weapons if indeed they had been firing at them. They could not expain why the bullet injuries on the corpses of the victims were so suspiciously similar. The contradictions began to mount and then the politicians like Rep Jack Murtha started demanding justice for the victims.

The world is watching.

Comments (Page 2)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Jun 05, 2006
"Just think of the people in Iraq who are being needlessly killed in the name of the American people."


So are the untold numbers murdered by anti-US and anti-Israel interests being needlessly killed in your name, Bahu? I believe Bahu doesn't write about such because there is no expectation of humanity from the people involved. Through his anger at the US he betrays the fact that he thinks very little of the people he pretends to be advocate for.
on Jun 05, 2006
Thank you. I really appreciate your words even if you do not agree with me. I will not be uncivil to any one and certainly not on the net. I must say your words did bring out one of the great aspects of blogging: that one can disagree in an agreeable manner. Thanks.


LIAR!! You are willing to see these Marines tried in the court of public opinion, there is NOTHING civil about that.

yes, Bahu, we can disagree without the venom... but if you can condemn US Marines, before there has even been a single charge levelled against them... well, then venom is all you have.
on Jun 06, 2006
"It's very, very tragic that on occasion, Iraqi civilians are injured or killed, and we take that very seriously," he said. "We don't like it, but we shouldn't rush to judgment on every incident that we see.

"Our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are facing a hostile and terrorist threat that refuses to abide by established rules of decency and laws of armed conflict," he continued. "Their mission is difficult, and they daily place their lives at risk to protect the people of Iraq. We should take great pride in the hundreds of thousands of servicemembers who honor us daily with their courage, their competence and their sacrifice."

Hey Bahu, whens the last time you were shot at?? Just curious..
on Jun 06, 2006
Oh my quotes came from this..

Probe Clears Coalition Forces of Wrongdoing in March 15 Raid

WASHINGTON, June 3, 2006 – An investigation has concluded that coalition forces "operated in accordance with the rules of engagement governing our combat forces in Iraq" during a March 15 raid in which Iraqi civilians died, a coalition spokesman said early today in Baghdad.
Army Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, Multinational Force Iraq spokesman, said that in response to claims that as many as 13 civilians were killed in the raid near Ishaqi, south of Samarra, officials launched an investigation the next day.

"The investigation revealed the ground force commander, while capturing and killing terrorists, operated in accordance with the rules of engagement governing our combat forces in Iraq," Caldwell said.

Credible intelligence led to the raid, in which Ahmad Abdallah Muhammad Nais al-Utai, also known as Hamza, a Kuwaiti-born al Qaeda cell leader, was captured and Uday Faris al-Tawafi, also known as Abu Ahmed, an Iraqi involved in making roadside bombs as well as recruiting local people to join the insurgency, was killed, Caldwell said.

When ground forces arrived at a house that intelligence reports said was being used as an insurgent safe house, they came under fire from the building, the general said.

"As the enemy fire persisted, the ground force commander appropriately reacted by incrementally escalating the use of force from small arms fire to rotary wing aviation, and then to close air support, ultimately eliminating the threat," he said.

"Allegations that the troops executed a family living in this safe house, and then hid the alleged crimes by directing an air strike, are absolutely false," the coalition spokesman added.

In the subsequent search, the general said, coalition forces documented the discovery Abu Ahmed's body and those of three noncombatants.

"The investigating officer concluded that possibly up to nine collateral deaths resulted from this engagement, but could not determine the precise number due to collapsed walls and heavy debris," Caldwell said, repeating that the investigating officer ascertained the ground force commander properly followed the rules of engagement as he "necessarily escalated the use of force until the threat was eliminated."

Caldwell noted that Arab and Western media have focused a great deal of attention recently on allegations of coalition troops killing innocent civilians in Iraq.

"Temptation exists to lump all these incidents together," he said. "However, each case needs to be examined individually. Let me be clear. Multinational Force Iraq does not and will not tolerate unethical or criminal behavior. All allegations of the loss of civilian life are thoroughly investigated. All loss of innocent life is tragic and unfortunate, and we regret such occurrences. We take all reports of improper conduct seriously; we investigate them thoroughly, and hold our troops accountable for their actions."
on Jun 06, 2006
I find it insane that people say the US should sit at the table with HAMAS, who has for years been murdering people for political reasons or out of sheer vengeance, and then a few weeks later pretend that this is somehow worse. Fatah was responsible for so many killings, sometimes of their own people, and yet they can stand up and pretend to be "moderate" diplomats in Palestine now.

This kind of facetious double-standard only undermines the cause of peace. It becomes obvious that peace isn't the goal, rather it is the constant harrowing denunciation of the US. If they had a problem with murderers, they wouldn't give ANY of them a pass. In Bahu's case, the US is the only bad-guy he is interested in, in a region chocked full of bad guys. It makes the denunciations hypocrotical and meaningless.
on Jun 08, 2006
WASHINGTON, June 3, 2006 – An investigation has concluded that coalition forces "operated in accordance with the rules of engagement governing our combat forces in Iraq" during a March 15 raid in which Iraqi civilians died, a coalition spokesman said early today in Baghdad. Army Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, Multinational Force Iraq spokesman, said that in response to claims that as many as 13 civilians were killed in the raid near Ishaqi, south of Samarra, officials launched an investigation the next day.


We are discussing the Haditha Incident not the Ishaqi or the Samarra killings. In any event the US Military will not find its own troops guity and if there is a probe into the killings of civilians it will only be an eye wash to fool the world. Let there be a credible International Inquiry like the Nuremberg Trials and you will see how many are indicted for crimes against humanity.
on Jun 08, 2006
"In any event the US Military will not find its own troops guity and if there is a probe into the killings of civilians it will only be an eye wash to fool the world. "


Okie doke, you've gone on record on that one. What will you do if you are wrong? Why, if I may ask, don't aren't you calling for war crimes trials for the leaders of Hamas who are now politicians after ordering the deaths of many, many civilians?

Do you think the leaders of Fatah should be sent to an international war crimes tribunal for events like the slaughter at Kibbutz Metzer? Your pet mass-murderers not only get a pass, but use the notoriety of their murders to propel them into the political arena. You should be ashamed of your hypocricy.
on Jun 08, 2006
Bahu,

You need to read "Marine charged in killing of Iraqis"
Link

and this one: "Still not charged with crime, sailor wears shackles"
Link

If AFTER the investigation they are found to be guilty and charged then prosecute them, but what has happened is everyone jumping to conclusions and accusing people of cover ups, murder and other things BEFORE the investigation is complete. It will not be the first or last time this happens. It happens in war, sorry, it happens. Get over it and realize the world is not a perfect place and never will be as long as man runs the show.

Oh and I would love to hear a comment from you if they do charge these guys. The Marine in the second story I linked to for you has not even been charged with anything yet. Nice huh.
on Jun 08, 2006
Oh and did you forget that we have already sentenced the soldiers involved in the "torture" of the prisoners at Abu Garib? Guess we covered that one up too.
on Jun 08, 2006
In any event the US Military will not find its own troops guity and if there is a probe into the killings of civilians it will only be an eye wash to fool the world.

This is an opinion with no basis in fact and belies your obviously biased views here. The truth is that the US military has tried and sentenced soldiers in the past when they were found to have committed crimes during war and probably will do so in the future. But they do not do so without facts to support the charges.

Your posts are so far in left field as to be laughable. You used the word "truth" in your title but you don't seem at all to be interested in truth, just your own political viewpoint and this makes you far too uncredible to be taken seriously. The truth is, none of us, yourself included, knows all of the actual facts of this situation.

I suppose objectivity is beyong your capability.
on Jun 08, 2006
We are discussing the Haditha Incident not the Ishaqi or the Samarra killings. In any event the US Military will not find its own troops guity and if there is a probe into the killings of civilians it will only be an eye wash to fool the world. Let there be a credible International Inquiry like the Nuremberg Trials and you will see how many are indicted for crimes against humanity.


Yet another outright lie Bahu.. Tell me, are you capable of the truth?
on Jun 09, 2006
Information about the sources of the Haditha allegations & "eyewitness" accounts is surfacing that raises questions about the currently-accepted theory of a "Mi Lai-style massacre" having taken place. There is at least a chance that the "massacre" is/was a hoax - a real event construed by some with an agenda into something it wasn't. Bahu will, of course, call this part of the disinformation campaign, but this story has a long way to go.
on Jun 09, 2006
bahus mindset:

"freedom fighter" cutting off someones head on live television... ignored


American military killing an armed combatant in a fire fight.. Atrocity! The poor man was out for a walk, and he just happened to be armed, when someone set a fire cracker off, the American military so blood thirsty and WANTING to kill used this opportunity to slaughter an innocent man.
on Jun 09, 2006
"American military killing an armed combatant in a fire fight.. Atrocity! The poor man was out for a walk, and he just happened to be armed, when someone set a fire cracker off, the American military so blood thirsty and WANTING to kill used this opportunity to slaughter an innocent man."


Could you point out where Bahu complained about us killing an armed combatant in a firefight? Just curious, I would like to read it.
on Jun 10, 2006
I think that manuy of the responses are just off the deep end. All that I am saying is that the Haditha Incident was absolutely unconsnable. Troops opening fire on unarmed civilians is just not done. And there are no mitigating circumstances. Now the US has a poor record of dealing with military crimes. Even Casey got off rather lightly and I will be quite surprised if there are murder charges brought to bear on the Kilo Company.

The reason why the killing of Zarqawi evokes no sympathy for him in many parts of the world is because he is perceived quite rightly as one who kills without compunction and for no reason except to provoke sectarian strife. However, that still does not mean that Iraqis do not have a right to self governm,ent and national and human dignity. Zarqawi was noe blot that has been removed.
4 Pages1 2 3 4