This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
And Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free
Published on June 3, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
The word Haditha is soon becoming a verb from its present location in the English language as a noun. Whenever the atrocities of the Occupation Forces were being highlighted in the Arab and Non Arab media, the immediate reaction of some self righteous individuals has been to dismiss the charges on the grounds that "we are too civilised to do all that". "Our Marines are too benign to indulge in such acts". "Our Governemnt is too upright not to indulge in cover ups" etc etc. The fact s are that the USA invaded Iraq without any reason on the pretext of the Weapons of Mass Destruction and having conquered the country tried its hand at setting the Sunnis an\gainst the Shiaas and the result is a full blown Insurgency which has careened out of control. Somewhere along the way are the inconvienient details of Abu Gahraib I and II, the use of Cluster Bombs on civilian targets, the wilfull destruction of a whole city-- Fallujah-- in the name of pacification and now Haditha. This catalogue of horrors can go on, but we owe it to the innocent dead to pause and reflect on Haditha and what it represents.

On November 19, 2005 a Marine outfit known as the Kilo Company belonging to the 3rd Battalion of the Ist Regiment was on patrol on the streets of Haditha. The policy of Rumsfeltf of not rotating the troops has been a factor since many of the marines were on their 3rd tour of duty in Iraq. Haditha is a small farming village/town along the banks of the Euphrates and is located 200 km north of the Capital. Though not part of the infamous Sunni Triangle, Haditha has become a centre of the insurgency against the occupying forces and here both the Sunnis and Shiaas have more or less a joint front. The flat mud roofed houses do not afford much protection. Of course, as in any Insurgency, there are attacks on the US forces. This Kilo Company had already acquired a degree of notoriety for its earlier counter insurgency.

Around 7:30 in the morning a bomb exploded on a street that was being patrolled by US marines in 5 humvees. All these humvees have had their undercarriage/chasis reinforced by armour plating. However, the Iraqi Insurgents use an IED which uses the conventional anti tank shell and is modified by the use of a pressure detonating device which means that when the vibrations of the approaching convoy reached the IED its charge is activated and its timer is usually set to blow up after 60 to 75 seconds. Most of the American casualities have been as a result of the IEDs. In societies which have turned against the invader such planning cannot take place without the approval/tacit support of the population. Afterall did not the Great Helmsman say that "insurgents are like fish in water".

The explosion killed one marine on the spot and injured several. What happened next is the stuff horrors are made of. The marine Terrazas was the one killed. A taxi cruising nearby was the first tatget. The Kilo Company opened fire and killed 5 young men in the taxi. The story put out by the Marines aftwer the Hadirah Massacre was that the young men in the taxi triggered the explosion. In the previous paragraph I have explained the mechanism of such IEDs. so the young men travelling in the Taxi were absolutely innocent.

After killing the young men in the car the Marines divided into two groups one went on a rampage while the other stood by and watched and helped in the cleanup and coverup that followed. The photos submitted by the marines do not show any of the dodies that bore the marks of bullet injuries. Only the buildings and the damaged humvees were shown. However, an amateur photographer took video rtecordings of the entire episode which has clearly brought out the fact of the cold blodded killings.One marine from the silent group took out his digital cameram and took some pictures and it is not clear whether these pictures were seen by the superior officers.

The Marines then put out the story that after the IED explosion there was firing from the roof tops. The houses in that part of Iraq as I have stated earlier are flat roofed and do not provide any protection. The local population has testified that the only firing wwas from the side of the Marine Unit.

The Kilo Company moved into 4 homes and a total of 24 men, women and choldren were shot in cold blood. Not a single one of then was a terrorist or even a militant insurgent. In fact the initial reaction of the higher ups in the US military when confronted with the facts of the Haditha Incident was to dismiss it as Al Qaeda Propaganda. The US Department of Defence now claims that it learnt about this Massacre only in Febuary 2006. Like in the case of the Abu Gharaib Affair, the attempt that is now being made is to fix the responsiblity for the Massacre on some junior officers and men and procalim that the political leadership was not complicit in the acrime. If this be the case then how come Saddam Hussain is being teied for war crimes when in fact he ordered only the excecution of the prisoners after due process. The Haditha Massacre has compromised US ability to hand out any punishment to Saddam because the conduct in the post Saddam period in not different from what existed earlier.

Now the coverup. The higherup in the Marine Command knew about the Haditha Massacre and decided to falsify the facts in order to make the whole thing seem like a fire fight with the Insurgents and the death of the civilians be passed off, yes, as "collateral damage". The Kilo Comany could not expalin why the young men in the car had no weapons if indeed they had been firing at them. They could not expain why the bullet injuries on the corpses of the victims were so suspiciously similar. The contradictions began to mount and then the politicians like Rep Jack Murtha started demanding justice for the victims.

The world is watching.

Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Jun 27, 2006
Thank god you at least see the truth of Zarqawi.

As to your article, I have to rebut quite a few of your arguments.

The facts are that the USA invaded Iraq without any reason on the pretext of the Weapons of Mass Destruction and having conquered the country tried its hand at setting the Sunnis an\gainst the Shiaas and the result is a full blown Insurgency which has careened out of control.


I underline "facts" because I find that quite amusing. You say "without any reason", but then you give a reason. The WMD trash talking has grown quite stale. We did not go into Iraq only on the prextext of WMD. Nor did we at any point claim that Saddam had nuclear weapons or that he was stockpiling huge amounts of nerve gas, etc. We did however go into Iraq on the basis that Saddam consistently refused to allow the UN inspectors into Iraq for years. When he did allow them in, our intelligence was able to show that it appeared things were being moved before the inspectors arrived. We also knew that he was trying to obtain nuclear weapons.

As I posted in response to your other article, the threat of WMD was real, and it continues to be real. The 300 artillery rounds recently found with nerve gas in them proves that Saddam was hiding it. Those shells could have very easily been sold, traded, or even stolen by terrorists with the intent of bringing them into the US. It is not improbable that they could have been deployed in a highly populated area with the intent to take out as many US civilians as possible. This is only one of the many reasons we went into Iraq.

Setting the Shi'ite's against the Sunni's is just laughable. The current government disproves any claim of such. In case you would really like to know the truth, the Sunni's have oppressed the Shi'ite people for over 40 years. It was very common for a Shi'ite family that opposed Saddam to be slaughtered. There are even public accounts of Saddam's loyalists torturing children of Shi'ite rebels by dipping them in bathtubs full of acid. ACID. Most of these loyalists were from the Sunni population. And yet, today we have a government elected by the people, composed of all factions. Now the government even offers amnesty to those willing to work together to bring peace.

I'll move on to the main topic. As others have said, the media and people like you have already tried and convicted these Marines. All based on information that you were given from sources that are not the most reliable. What ever happened to due process? The right to trial? Innocent until proven guilty? These are basic precepts of American culture, and yet in today's media and communication savvy world, people throw it all out the window.

You will notice that I do not defend the Marines. I won't, until the *facts* have been laid out. They may never be released to the public. If the Marines are guilty, then they should be punished. But they must be proven guilty first.

Claims that the current state of Iraq is worse then it was under the Saddam regime are beyond silly. I am currently in Iraq. This is my second tour here, I was with the forces that crossed the border in 2003. I can tell you that I have read many reports, and even spoken to several Iraqi's. During the Saddam era, people were murdered, raped, tortured, and brutalized. I currently work in a place called the "Perfume Palace". Know why it was called that? It was a place where Saddam and his sons would routinely keep women for their enjoyment. Not women that wanted to be here. Women that were kidnapped from their families, taken away to be Saddam's playthings. If they refused, they were commonly put out in another building nearby that sits in the middle of a lake. These sweathouses have no type of protection from the blazing sun. The women were staked out there to the ground, sometimes naked, for days at a time, given no food or water. Many died there.

So don't go telling me that the US has commited atrocities against Iraq. Yes, there are instances of individuals who have crossed the line. And those who are proven beyond a shadow of doubt to be guilty, will be punished. It is not the media's job or yours to put these men on trial, or to judge them. That's why we have a justice system, and we will always have one.



on Jun 29, 2006
The WMD trash talking has grown quite stale. We did not go into Iraq only on the prextext of WMD


Then you imply that the Sec of State lied in the UNO when he said that the WMD is the reason why the US sought a UN resolution to invade. Since a second resolution was not forthcoming because of European resistance, a unilateral invasion. Then let the US Administration declare publically that WMD was not the reason for invasion but regime change. Why are the Bushmen silent on that.

Setting the Shi'ite's against the Sunni's is just laughable. The current government disproves any claim of such. In case you would really like to know the truth, the Sunni's have oppressed the Shi'ite people for over 40 years. It was very common for a Shi'ite family that opposed Saddam to be slaughtered. T


The sectarian violence now engulfing Iraq was the direct consequence of favoring Shiaa identity politics in Iraq. The real and imagined excesses of Saddam Hussein cannot be an excuse for the wanton destruction that is going on in Iraq. Instaed of bringing the groups together the US backed regime tried to lock the Sunnis out of power and then the Sunni sectarian violence melded with Iraqi national resistance.

As others have said, the media and people like you have already tried and convicted these Marines


I have neither tried them nor convicted them. I have only drawn attention to the Haditha Incident and the US investigation has essentially proved what I have said. The DoD will press murder charges on members of the Kilo Company.

Claims that the current state of Iraq is worse then it was under the Saddam regime are beyond silly.


Wrong again. You may be in Iraq and being there close to what is happenisn. But death and mayhenm like what you are seeing now belies your claim. The US invasion has not brought peace and tranqulity to Iraq at all.
on Jul 01, 2006
Now the US Military is investigating yet another atrocityu of the Marines in Iraq. In this one 4 marines are said to have raped an Iraqi woman and killed her and the entire family. This atrocity came tro light because of the psychological sress caused to those who took part in it. These are not lies but documnted cases currently being investigated.
on Jul 04, 2006
Just an up date on the latest atrocity. The group of 4 marines from the 101 Air Borne Division, remember the one that flew over Normandy and played a heroic role, yes from the same Division, changed their uniforms and got into dark clothes barged into a house of a young Iraqi coupe and first killed the father, mother and theitr 5 year daughter. Then in the adjoining room the marines raped their elder daughter and after 2 hours of rape and torture finally killed her with 2 bullets to her temple.

This is the truth as determined by the Federal investigatioon.
on Jul 10, 2006
It is yet to be made officially public, but it appears likely that an attempt to cover up the truth of the Haditha incident was indeed made and that senior officers were either complicit in the cover up or derelict in not recognizing it.

To the extent the US troops involved in the actual incident and those who knowingly engaged in covering it up or failed to recognize what was going down under their noses are culpable, they should face appropriate courts-martial. Same for the 4 troops from the 101st if the story currently floating around turns out to be true.

And therein lies the difference between us and them. Have you seen Al-Jazeera calling for any investigations of the masked men doing the videotaped beheadings? Or heard any condemnation of same from Al Qaeda?
on Jul 10, 2006
Just an up date on the latest atrocity. The group of 4 marines from the 101 Air Borne Division, remember the one that flew over Normandy and played a heroic role, yes from the same Division, changed their uniforms and got into dark clothes barged into a house of a young Iraqi coupe and first killed the father, mother and theitr 5 year daughter. Then in the adjoining room the marines raped their elder daughter and after 2 hours of rape and torture finally killed her with 2 bullets to her temple.


Atrocity? This is a criminal act. The suspects had been eyeing the girl for days before the incident. This wasn't activity in a military capacity. This was extra-curricular. Stress doesn't cause you to plan a rape, and subsequent murders to cover it up. Stress causes you to snap. This doesn't appear to be snapping. I hate to say it, I actually think the perpetrators, when found guilty, should be executed for that.


It is yet to be made officially public, but it appears likely that an attempt to cover up the truth of the Haditha incident was indeed made and that senior officers were either complicit in the cover up or derelict in not recognizing it.

To the extent the US troops involved in the actual incident and those who knowingly engaged in covering it up or failed to recognize what was going down under their noses are culpable, they should face appropriate courts-martial. Same for the 4 troops from the 101st if the story currently floating around turns out to be true.


Notice how Haditha is only a story in the West. It's not big news in the Arab world. Abu Ghraib was considered far worse. That's the difference between the West and the Middle East. To them, shame, and insult to honor is far worse than death. To us, we tend to believe that was horrendous, but at least we are alive. They have no problem killing a daughter who was raped. It's seen as an insult to the family's honor. I understand where they're coming from, I just think it's hideous.

And therein lies the difference between us and them. Have you seen Al-Jazeera calling for any investigations of the masked men doing the videotaped beheadings? Or heard any condemnation of same from Al Qaeda?


No. Nobody expects it either. It's their mentality. It would violate the paradigm of the Arab world in which every issue is viewed "Us vs. the infidels".
on Jul 11, 2006
It is yet to be made officially public, but it appears likely that an attempt to cover up the truth of the Haditha incident was indeed made and that senior officers were either complicit in the cover up or derelict in not recognizing it.

To the extent the US troops involved in the actual incident and those who knowingly engaged in covering it up or failed to recognize what was going down under their noses are culpable, they should face appropriate courts-martial. Same for the 4 troops from the 101st if the story currently floating around turns out to be true.

And therein lies the difference between us and them. Have you seen Al-Jazeera calling for any investigations of the masked men doing the videotaped beheadings? Or heard any condemnation of same from Al Qaeda?


For the first time you seem to have agreed to what we have written and I record my thanks to you. However,I have not equated the US military with the Terrorists in the Near/ Middle East.Being a State and a Democratic, Constititional polity the US has perforce to hold itself accountable to a higher standard of professional military conduct. We do not expect terrorists to be civilised and hence thre is no point in saying that no one is critical of the terrorists.
on Jul 11, 2006
This doesn't appear to be snapping. I hate to say it, I actually think the perpetrators, when found guilty, should be executed for that


Agreed. I do not want to sound cynnical, but there are few who expect the death sentence to be handed and carried out. However the world is watching to see how the USA handles this particular crime and the Haditha crime.


It's not big news in the Arab world. Abu Ghraib was considered far worse.


The Arab Media is screaming about the Mahmoudiya and Haditha incident. Do not see this and other such violations of human rights as "US" vs "THEM". There was a lot of support for the US over 9/11 and hence it would be wrong to maintain that we get them before they get us. TYhis is the logic of the jungle.
on Jul 11, 2006
The Arab Media is screaming about the Mahmoudiya and Haditha incident.


I can watch Arab media via online sources such as Mosaic and from my cable tv provider. There's very little talk of Haditha, and the level of talk about the rape and killings in Mahmoudiya is much higher in the US than it is there. Why? For starters, when it comes to Haditha, violent death is an every day occurence in Iraq. It's not shocking, it's not out of the ordinary, and it certainly isn't insulting. Death before dishonor.

As for Mahmoudiya, apparently the insurgency has been claiming that Coalition troops regularly rape and kill Iraqis, so to the average person who believed those stories, this is certainly nothing new, just something they have learned to live with.

This reminds me of when I was 12 and I told all my neighbor friends that I would be on the traveling all-star team in little league. I hadn't actually been selected until another kid got hurt about two weeks later; therefore I took his spot. When I actually got selected, I again told my friends, in a burst of excitement, that I had been selected for the all-star team. My friends looked at me like I was crazy. I had already told them weeks before that I made the team, so my excitement was out of place.

Do not see this and other such violations of human rights as "US" vs "THEM". There was a lot of support for the US over 9/11 and hence it would be wrong to maintain that we get them before they get us. TYhis is the logic of the jungle


No, there wasn't "a lot of support for the US over 9/11" in the Middle East. You must be mistaking that for bizarro world. There was a plethora of conspiracy theories, and some street celebrations when it happened. And when America went to war in Afghanistan, regardless of the revisionism you or anyone wishes to engage in, there was anger in the Arab street about it. Additionally, you do not understand what I said. "Us vs. them" is the Middle Eastern Arab-Moslem paradigm through which relations are viewed with outsiders are understood. Remember the saying: Me against my brother, me and my brother against my cousin, my brother, my cousin and I against the stranger. It help with understanding the region.
on Jul 12, 2006
I never mind agreeing with the truth - I just waited for evidence to actually be available before arriving at what is still a preliminary opinion.

We do not expect terrorists to be civilised and hence thre is no point in saying that no one is critical of the terrorists.

Giving them a pass like that is nuts, not to mention suicidal. You can't hold one side to a moral standard while excusing the other and still be taken seriously.
on Jul 12, 2006
You can't hold one side to a moral standard while excusing the other and still be taken seriously


State are bound by Law, Treaties, Conventions and the like. And these are self evident. Terrorist groups are non state actors and are not governed by any of the norms of civilised conduct. That is why we hold the USA accountable to a much higher standard of political and military conduct. I am not equating USA with Al Qaeda.
on Jul 12, 2006
State are bound by Law, Treaties, Conventions and the like. And these are self evident. Terrorist groups are non state actors and are not governed by any of the norms of civilised conduct. That is why we hold the USA accountable to a much higher standard of political and military conduct. I am not equating USA with Al Qaeda.


Sorry, I refuse to give them free reign to do as they please without fear of being held accountable. The uncivilized will get civilized or they'll get dead.
on Jul 17, 2006
Sorry, I refuse to give them free reign to do as they please without fear of being held accountable. The uncivilized will get civilized or they'll get dead.


This means killing civilians on a scale that will make the Gterman FINAL SOLUTION a kids party. Of coursr non state actors are accountable, we are only discussing the methods by which such accountability is to be judged and later enforced. USA does not have the right, though it may have the means to bomb the living daylights out of large swathes of the world in the name of fighting terrorism.
on Jul 17, 2006
Spare me, Bahu. What a crock of shit. The civilians harboring these vermin are at risk, no question about it, but their numbers are small and it ain't like they don't know. You keep trying to make ridding the world of terrorists the moral equivalent of the Holocaust and that is morally bankrupt, not to mention irrational.
on Apr 18, 2007
The marines will not be charged for the Haditha Massacre.
4 Pages1 2 3 4