This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Freedom of the Individual in danger
Published on November 20, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
The Dutch have entered the English language in a rather strange way, the pharse Dutch Uncle. This character is a well endwed, if genrous man who can always be counted on for a no strings attached loan of help. The Dutch Uncle is always a wee bit stupid. well meaning and not above an ocassional tantrum. From such a benign presence in the world of symbols and objects the Dutch are clearly making waves for the wrong reasons. The Right wing Government in power wants to impose a ban on women wearing the Islamic head dress/hijab. The question that this proposed ban raises are as follows:

In what way if the Government of the Dutch nation different from other Islamic dictatorships which impose restrictions on women?
How can any democratic government issue a diktat on so personal an issue as the dress the one chooses or chooses not to wear?

In these days of hieghtened Islamophobia, the very act of suppressing the mislim headdress will be trotted out as a graet example of Women's liberation and progrssive social ideals. Instead the decision of the Dutch governemnt only goes to show that behind the fascade of democracy and human rights there lurks an intolerant and fanatical society willing to suppress the fundamental rights of its own citizens inorder to promote religious divisions.

There will be an Islamic reaction to this. The issues raised by the Prophet's cartoons have not been forgotten as yet. And the latest development is only another instance of racist inspied intolerance masqueradfing an progressive concern for womens rights and equality.

Comments
on Nov 20, 2006
I disagree with these laws, and I see them as an enemy of freedom.

That said, I think that Muslims are paying for the apathy we've been complaining about. Had the silent majority of Muslims been as vocal as radicals they'd have defined themselves differently. Had they resisted those members of their community and actively worked to purge themselves of hateful proponents of terrorism, we wouldn't associate the Muslim uniform with hate and things we fear.

Also, don't forget that this isn't just about cartoons to the Dutch, they've had THEIR freedom threatened by Islamic intolerance, even to the point of having their own citizens murdered.
on Nov 20, 2006
Never heard the expression Dutch Uncle. But Have heard of a dutch date.

And I agree with Baker. Restrictions on freedom are not good, but when you threaten someones life, do not expect them to hand you a freedom medal.
on Nov 20, 2006
And I agree with Baker. Restrictions on freedom are not good, but when you threaten someones life, do not expect them to hand you a freedom medal.


That said, I think that Muslims are paying for the apathy we've been complaining about.


Precisely...



on Nov 21, 2006
By and large I too agree, but I find the term "Islamic apathy" somewhat troubling. Can we blame the average man on the Arab/Islamic street for the sins of the extremeists who have hijacked Islam today. Islam is both a religious entity and a potent political force. The balace beteen the two is yet to be worked out and the intolerance of the Western democracies is not helping.