This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Iraq will burn even more
Published on December 29, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
The confirmation of the death sentence handed down to Saddam Hussein is not a surprise. In a few days time Saddam would be killed and the Iraqis will have a new symbol to rally around. In fact Saddam will play a far greater role after death than he ever did in his lifetime. The trial which was held in connection with the Dujail killings was not free and fair. Right from the start the decks were stacked against the former President. The judges were frequently changed anfd the prececution team was specilly trained for its job by the occupiers. The trbunal itself derives its so called legality from a statute promulgated by the occupation powers and the Dujail killings were retrospectively brought under the ambit of the statute. Such retroactive promulgation is ususally avaided in countries that pride themselves as upholders of the rule of law.

The Defence team was under constant pressure from the governmnent and Shiaa death squads associated with it. Four of Saddam's lawers were killed and the triasl was frequently disrupted. Under any notion of jurisprudence Saddam cannot be held responsible for the Dujail killings, extra legal they may well have been.

It is not claer why the use of chemical weapons in the Iran war and the gassing of 150,000 Kurds is not been taken up. The fact of the matter is that during the Iran -Iraq War of the 1980s Saddam Hussein was a steadfast and valuable ally of the USA and the occupying power does not want its complicity on Hussein's crimes to be made public. Therefore hang Saddam so that the truth of these other crimes can forever be hidden.

The impending excecution of the former President will be like the January 30 1649 excecution of the Stuart king, Charles I. He will pass from a corruptible to an incorruptible crown. And the vilolence in Iraq will be beyond even the present unsustainable level.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 29, 2006
He could also have simply been sent over to Kuwait to stand trial for what he did there. I don't think it really matters, frankly. His guilt is obvious.

I'm not so sure it will happen in the next couple of days, though. It was my understanding that they needed to complete the current trial beforehand. Maybe they decided not to bother, I wouldn't.
on Dec 29, 2006
The confirmation of the death sentence handed down to Saddam Hussein is not a surprise. In a few days time Saddam would be killed and the Iraqis will have a new symbol to rally around. In fact Saddam will play a far greater role after death than he ever did in his lifetime


This is probably very true - he will become the martyr for the cause to be bandied about with myth building around him turning him into a hero that he never was.

This man deserves death as a punishment as do all his henchmen. The quicker they do it the better, however as with all death sentences there will probably the usual delays involved. He should just have been put up against a wall and shot at the time of capture. Not legal I know - but oh so just and cost free except for the one bullet.
on Dec 29, 2006

Therefore hang Saddam so that the truth of these other crimes can forever be hidden.

Another conspiracy theory......

 

 

 

on Dec 29, 2006
I'm not so sure it will happen in the next couple of days


It has already happened as I predicted in the blog. But more seriously, will the death of Saddam Hussein change anything on the ground. It will only make a martyr out of him.
on Dec 30, 2006
Dunno why they rushed it, frankly. Wasn't he in the middle of another trial? I remember reading that he would complete that one before he was excecuted.

I always had a dim hope that he'd be sent to Kuwait to face his crimes there, as well.
on Dec 30, 2006

I always had a dim hope that he'd be sent to Kuwait to face his crimes there, as well.


Let's face it - there's something a little farcical about the dictator of Kuwait sentencing Hussein to death for being a more aggressive dictator than he was. Better for everyone that people forget that Kuwait was returned to a dictatorship after Saddam was pushed out.
on Dec 30, 2006
When the leader of Kuwait invades another nations and commits the kind of wholesale atrocities that Hussein kids committed on Kuwait I might see the equation. His evils bled out in the form of supporting Palestinian terrorism, invading other nations, threatening Israel with missile attacks, etc. It's great that Iraqis have a better hope of living without sanctions and putting something better together, but in the end few gave a damn until he started annexing other nations as Iraqi property.
on Dec 30, 2006
Strangely enough, our customarily anti-war, anti-Bush rag this morning only mentioned the celebrations by Iraqis in response to his execution. None of the gloom/doom/He'll now be a martyr/Bahu silliness. He'll continue to be a martyr to the people who considered him a martyr or hero yesterday, but that's about it, and a pretty small crowd at that. No Che Guevarra style myth for him, I'm afraid.
on Dec 31, 2006


He'll continue to be a martyr to the people who considered him a martyr or hero yesterday, but that's about it, and a pretty small crowd at that. No Che Guevarra style myth for him, I'm afraid.


Did not the myth of Charles I live on. The death of Saddam was choreographed so carefully and his words so well chosen, It was I whi built Iraq, that it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that Saddam has joined the ranks of the other great hero of Iraq, who by the way was a Kurd, Saladin.
on Dec 31, 2006
I take it you have gotten up before dawn and have already prayed to your hero, Saddam, then?

Bahu...your true colors are ever showing clearly in these statements....
on Dec 31, 2006
Chuck who?

Saladin?

In Saddam's eternal wet dreams, maybe.
on Jan 06, 2007
In fact even President George Bush has come out openly against the undignified manner in which Saddam Hussein was put to death. But then can a lynch mob be dignified.
on Jan 06, 2007
Do you believe Hussein deserved a dignified death, Bahu? Do you think despots should be sheltered from their naysayers, even on the gallows?
on Jan 06, 2007
Do you believe Hussein deserved a dignified death, Bahu? Do you think despots should be sheltered from their naysayers, even on the gallows?


Every human being deserves dignity in death. And that includes the likes of Pol ,Pot, Stalin, Mao and Saddam. I baulk at putting him in this list, but I think Saddam Hussein has become a favorite hate figure.

Had he been tried in accordance with International Law and not as lynch mob, he would have still recived a death sentence but then we can say that law took its course. That is not the case now when he was put to death in a hasty maNNER, TAUNTED AND RIDICULED EVEN AS HE climbed up the gallows.
on Jan 06, 2007
I suppose it is a matter of opinion, but death is death, and whether you are treated like a hero in your last moments or spit upon results in the same end. You're dead. Given the death in question was considered a punishment for deeds done, I see no reason why "dignity" should even be a factor.

It's convenient for you that you agree with international law. It's much like rabid federalists in the US who use federal law, courts, etc., to trump state matters that are really none of their business. Saddam wasn't being tried by the world, he was in an Iraqi court, and international law means zilch.
2 Pages1 2