This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
Look at the past
Published on January 5, 2007 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
The excecution of Saddam Hussein aon the day of Id marks an opportune moment to look back on his life, his brand of politics and of course, his relationship with the US which extended over three decades. I must say at the very outset that I deplore all that Saddam Hussein did in his life time, but yet maintain that the killing was not just bad politics but totally unjustified due to the fact that he did not receive a fair trial.

Saddam Hussein was born on 28th April 1937 near Tikri to a shepherd Arab family and was brought up by his stepfather for whom Saddam retained a great deal of real affection. He did not attend school till the age of 12 and learnt to read and write only in his teens. The early political formation of Saddam and men of his generation from less priveleged social backgrounds was in the Arab Socialist Baath Party which was influence deeply by Nasser's ideas of Arab nationalism. In the Arab Baath vision of politics there was no place for sectarian/religious/tribal identities. The US invasion of Iraq and its barbaric assault on the Iraqi polpulation has unravelled the carapace of pan regional Arab identity that was built up over the years, after Suez crisis of 1956.

In Iraq as well as in neighboring Iran, the Communist Parties were quite powerful and recived the full backing og the Soviets. In this deady coktail of cold war politics and Arab nationalism, Saddam Hussein plunged head long. The Iraqi monary established by the British was overthrown by General Karim Kassim, who was supported by the Communists. Though it is not clear from the primary records, there have been persistent echoes across the Arab world of Saddam Hussein being in the pay of the CIA which was trying to subvert the Iraqi government with the silent support of Nasser in Egypt. In 1959 Saddam Hussein participated in an attempted assasination of the Prime Minister of Iraq, Kassim.He escaped with a bullet in his leg and the scars of that injury remained all his life. As can be expected he was sentenced to death in absentia as he had escaped to Egypt. Had this sentence been activated and Saddam executed it would have been more just and honest. In Cairo Hussein trained to be a lawyer.

In 1963 the American backed CIA coup overhrew Qassim and this was just the first of several CIA operations in the Middle East. Saddam was back in Baghdad and the CIA provided him a list of prominent Communists and Saddam proved his mettle by tracking down and having a large number of communists killed. The Baath Party filled the political vacucum created by the eslipse of the Communists. In neighboring Iran too the CIA sponsored a coup in which a Natioanlist government was overhrown and the Shah and his blood thirst crew brought back. In 1963 Saddam Hussein became the Vice Secretary General of the Baath Party and in 1968 played an important role in the Coup that toppled the regime in Baghdad and in this coup too the US hand is suspected.

In the early 1970's Saddam Hussein was secure in his position to ease out Ahmed Bakr, a Tikriti, and became the dominant political personality. At every step he was aided by his deep and abiding links with the CIA. In fact the Baathist regime under Saddam Hussein was reviled all over the Third World as a right wing dictatorship. What was not understood by the American sponsors of Saddam Hussein was that though he was willing to play ball with the Amricans, he was at heart an Arab Nationalist. One of the first acts of Saddam Hussein in power was to nationalise the oil and petroleum wealth of Iraq, a major blow to the US interests. Now we can understand why a President with strong links to the Oil Companies like George Bush II was so eager to launch an all out war against Saddam Hussein and even collaborate in his execution.

In 1972 Saddam Hussein signed a Treaty of Friendship with the then Soviet Union He embarked upon a programme of social and economic development in Iraq which transformed Iraq from a poor backward country into a vibrant economy. Saddam Hussein was responsible for spreading literacy in Iraq and today that country has the highest rate of literacy in the middel east. He launched a programme of Cummpulsory Free Education in Iraq and instituted land reforms that completely changed the face of Iraqi socirty. In fact the UNESCO honored Saddam Hussein with its highest award for the program.

Throughout the 1970's and 1980's the USA enjoyed the closest of ties with the regime of Saddam Hussein. The Iranian revolution had overthrown the client monarchy in Iran and the USA began to build up Saddam Hussein as a bulwark against what it preceived to be the threat of the Iranian Revolution spreading into the rest of the Arab world. USA in particular stoked Saddam's ambition of becoming the preeminent power in the region. Though Saddam Hussein and his Baath Party were staunch nationalists, the Iranian Government began to fan the fires of Shiaa sectatrian opposition to Saddam Hussein. The fact that Saddam had the complete backing of the USA and other western powers throughout the 8 long years of the Iran-Iraq War which took more that 1.5 million lives.In that war Kuwait with its cash rich oil weatth had promised Iraq a sum of 30 billion US $ as its contribution to the war against Iran. Kuwait never kept the promise and Iraq was drained of its oil wealth during the course of the war. The US gave military aid to the tune of 1.5 billion US dollars to Saddam Hussein dring the Iran Iraq War. This fact is hidden in all the discussions on the US relationship with the deposed dictator. This fact also explains why Saddam was not tried for the more serious charges of war crimes during the Iran Iraq war. Had a trial been held the truth of US complicity would have come out.

The problem with Kuwait was not just the promise of the war charges. During the Iran Iraq war, Kuwait bagan side drilling the oil fields near the border with Iraq and extracted oil worth a few billion. And Kuwait was a provinve of the Ottoman Empire and Iraq has always had claims over Kuwait and trhe only reason the West created Kuwait as an independent emirate was to protect its investment in Kuwait.

It is at this point Saddam made his biggest mistake: he marched into Kuwait in earlyn 1991 thinking that the US will back him as it had done in the past. That was a major miscalculation and the UN imposed sanctions regime led to the death of more than a million Iraqis.

How will the Iraqis remember Saddam Hussein? After the passions exited by the US sponsored Idenntity politics dies down, the Iaqis will remember Saddam Hussein as a martyr killed by the USA when he asserted Arab natioanlist pride.

Comments (Page 1)
6 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jan 05, 2007
whatever Bahu
on Jan 05, 2007
This is nothing but pro-Saddam propaganda.  Most Iraqi will remember Sadam as an oppressive dictator who brutally murdered hundreds of thousands of people. 
on Jan 05, 2007
Most Iraqi will remember Sadam as an oppressive dictator who brutally murdered hundreds of thousands of people.


similar to the way most iranians will remember the shah...or nicaraguans the somozas...or chileans pinochet.
on Jan 05, 2007
similar to the way most iranians will remember the shah...or nicaraguans the somozas...or chileans pinochet.


At least you get the right thugs. Bahu cant even do that.
on Jan 05, 2007
Yep, nations have thresholds for how much evil they can tolerate. Oddly, you fail to point out that as Hussein's evils became more and more known to the world, the CLOSER he became to "anti-war" nations. As the US decided he was just to much of a nut to deal with, nations like France and Germany and China and others forged stronger and stronger ties.

They were meeting with him, offering gifts, sending executives from their biggest companies, etc., up to a couple of months before the US invaded. Deals to resupply his military were already inked, they were just waiting for the sanctions to be lifted eventually. China was already shipping in fiber optics to update his air defenses, which he was using to fire at coalition aircraft in the no-fly-zone.

Maybe I'm not remembering correctly, Bahu, refresh my memory. Weren't you one of the ones proclaiming the suffering of the Iraqi people under sanctions before the war? Quoting hideous numbers like thousands of children dying a day, yadda yadda?

So, I have to ponder your attitude since the war, and your attitude concerning containment, and your attitude concerning the UN supplying Hussein while his people suffered. To me, the only solution that would have satisfied you would have been to leave Saddam in place, and remove the sanctions. No, I think you don't have much right to condemn the US for supporting Hussein, when obviously a continuation of Hussein's evils was your most favored outcome.
on Jan 05, 2007
In that war Kuwait with its cash rich oil weatth had promised Iraq a sum of 30 billion US $ as its contribution to the war against Iran. Kuwait never kept the promise and Iraq was drained of its oil wealth during the course of the war.


So now the 30 billion that Iraq owed Kuwait because he borrowed it to fund his war was a pledge from Kuwait? If I understand you correctly you are saying that the reason Iraq gave for its attack on Kuwait was the theft of its oil and to avoid paying back the billions it owed Kuwait. I like how you re-write history.
on Jan 05, 2007
Bahu - the way you are going on about Saddam makes me think of Col Genes obsession with Bush...you are fast becoming obsessed with all Hussein. The horse is dead already - leave it alone now.
on Jan 05, 2007
BRAVO!! FINALLY A FAIR AND DECENT ARTICLE ABOUT THIS GREAT MAN!!

LIBERALMAN
on Jan 06, 2007
The horse is dead already - leave it alone now


This horse may be dead, but it will ride on.  Iraq gave for its attack on Kuwait was the theft of its oil and to avoid paying back the billions it owed Kuwait. I

The mury details will eventually out. The fact is that Kuwait had signed on for the War against Iran and had undertaken to bear a part of the expenses of the Iraqi war effort. You seem to forget that the Shiaa revolution was as much a threat to the conservative sultanates of the Gulf as it was to US oil interests. Saddam felt that as a major "secular" force in the middle east, he had the political and politicaL MUSCLE TO TAKE ON Iran. And in this USA supported him to the hilt, a fact that is now forgotten.



No, I think you don't have much right to condemn the US for supporting Hussein, when obviously a continuation of Hussein's evils was your most favored outcome

I have not supported the tregime of Saddam Hussein at all. There is no difference between the regime of al Maliki and his Shiaa death squads backed by the US in the Green Zone and the regime of Saddam/
on Jan 06, 2007
You can say you don't support it, but then the only possible outcome you allow for morally is leaving Hussein to do whatever he wants. Sanctions, containment, regime change, all brought nothing but criticism and outrage from you. After a while, it begins to appear as if the only eventuality you would be satisfied with is Hussein back in his 1980's prime.
on Jan 06, 2007
There is no difference between the regime of al Maliki and his Shiaa death squads backed by the US in the Green Zone and the regime of Saddam/


Actually, there is a lot of difference, but you don't want to understand that.
on Jan 06, 2007
Saddam felt that as a major "secular" force in the middle east, he had the political and politicaL MUSCLE TO TAKE ON Iran. And in this USA supported him to the hilt, a fact that is now forgotten.


Forgotten by whom? All I read during the run up to the war was Saddam had no WMD and the US saying yes he did because we sold it to him. We went to war and still can't account for all the stuff we know he had, I am not talking about the stuff we and all major intel sercives around the world thinks he may have produced but the stuff Saddam admitted he had after the Gulf war. If he was being honest with us then where is the stuff? If he was being dishonest with us then we have a larger worry because the stuff we think he produced added to the stuff we know he had means there is a huge amount of chemical and biological war stock that is missing. Had he left the facilities in place and built new ones then he would have been able to hide new stocks better but he hid everything including the equipment. That is a problem!

on Jan 06, 2007
yall seem to be missing bahu's larger point.

based on his research--none of which has been refuted nor has anyone even attempted to do so on this thread--hussein's iraq was a product of us foreign policy. which is to say, the west (starting with the brits after wwi) is in very large part responsible for iraq becoming a rogue state. should things continue the way they've been going, we will also be responsible for it becoming a failed state.

establishing and maintaining plausible deniability in regard to the former required hussein to be prosecuted for crimes about which the scope could be most closely controlled by the court so as to prevent him from raising the issue of complicity and revealing who did what when.

while hussien appears to have committed far greater crimes than the one for which he was tried, only one death warrant was necessary; executing him rapidly as possible eliminated any ability on his part to reveal the many secrets to which he was privy.
on Jan 06, 2007
If he was being dishonest with us then we have a larger worry because the stuff we think he produced added to the stuff we know he had means there is a huge amount of chemical and biological war stock that is missing. Had he left the facilities in place and built new ones then he would have been able to hide new stocks better but he hid everything including the equipment. That is a problem!


exactly.

isn't there some sorta aphormism about secrets dying unrevealed with those who keep them?
on Jan 06, 2007
Actually, there is a lot of difference, but you don't want to understand that.


yup. there's way more shia than sunnis in the new government. neither maliki nor al-sadr wears military uniforms--yet. neither one has absolute power--yet.

give em time.

hussein's baghdad wasn't built in a day either.
6 Pages1 2 3  Last