This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
USA will have to withdraw from Iraq
Published on February 14, 2007 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
The Baghdad Security Paln has been launched with great fanfare. The al Maliki Government and the Secretary Defence, Dr Robert Gates were both extremely optimistic about the success of this Plan. A week into the operation and six appache helicopters later the Plan has slowly, but surely, begun to get stuck. Let me state that the paln was well thought out and could have worked has certain basic conditions been met. First, there was need for the sectarian violence to be tamed through a political dialogue and this did not take palce. Second, as we pointed out earlier counter measures were being taken for the new kind of warfare that the Coalition had launched in Iraq. While it is clear that Iran stands to gain the most from the mess in Iraq, the US administration has irked Iran by raiding the embassies and by amking provocative public statements. Iran could have been asked to help contain the Shiaa Militias and there is every possibility that they would have obliged because chaos in Iraq is not in the long term interest of Iran.

One fact that is emerging quite clearly is that the Militias are not directly confronting the Iraqi and American forces. This maeans that the militamen simply vanish and reappear after the coast is clear. What is really worrisome is that weapon chaches have not been found in significant numbers. The plan of holding the territory after sweeping it clean of militants sounds good in theory but it is difficult to immplement it. Further the Iraqi forces taking part are all loyal to al Muqtadar, the radical cleric, and hence foredoomed to failure.

Comments
on Feb 14, 2007
Is Bahu Virupaksha’s brain failing? Al Sader has packed up and moved out of the country for safety yet you suggest that the plan is failing. If we were losing so badly why would the chief agitator need to seek a vacation? Could it be that we are really winning and they know it? We still have not sent in the surge of troops yet and people are fast running for cover, this is a funny way of demonstrating how they are winning and we are losing.

One fact that is emerging quite clearly is that the Militias are not directly confronting the Iraqi and American forces. This maeans that the militamen simply vanish and reappear after the coast is clear.


Yeah, your great powers of observation have pointed out the obscure facts of gorilla warfare. Granted that the tactic is only a few thousand years old but you noticed what the military knew years ago in Iraq, you also noticed three years after Saddam said this was how he was going to fight us that this is what they are doing. WOW any other discoveries on your part? You know like the sun rising or setting?
on Feb 14, 2007
I think your observations are premature. The plan, in its entirety, has not yet been launched.
on Feb 15, 2007
Al Sader has packed up and moved out of the country for safety yet you suggest that the plan is failing. If we were losing so badly why would the chief agitator need to seek a vacation? Could it be that we are really winning and they know it? We still have not sent in the surge of troops yet and people are fast running for cover, this is a funny way of demonstrating how they are winning and we are losing.


The news that the radical Shiaa cleric has moved does not imply that he is running for cover. In fact it is this Mahdi Aemy that sustains the Government of al Maliki.

The plan, in its entirety, has not yet been launched


May be. But from the inauspisious beginning it is unlikely to be a success.
on Feb 15, 2007
The news that the radical Shiaa cleric has moved does not imply that he is running for cover. In fact it is this Mahdi Aemy that sustains the Government of al Maliki.


Let me see if I understand you correctly. The fact that the leader of the mighty Mahdi army has chosen this time to take a vacation in Iran means nothing. The fact that Iran has been supporting the Mahdi army against the Iraqi army in order to destroy any chances of a free Iraq and they have not been able to hold more than a third of the nation while the other two thirds are relatively peaceful and prospering shows that even with massive support from an enemy nation there is little chance they will succeed. If the Iraqi nation was weak then the Iranians would have made short work of them by now.

May be. But from the inauspisious beginning it is unlikely to be a success.


I see it differently, I see it as al they have heard is the plan which has not started yet and they are already running back to Iran for help. I just think your brain is failing to register the truth.