This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
There is no real ubstitute for Petrol
Published on June 3, 2007 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
Ever since George Bush talked about American "addiction to oil" there has been a flurry of policy statements about alternative fuels, particularly plant or cereal based organic extracts that can be blended with petrol to make alternate fuels. Like many of Bush's policy steaments and policies this quest for alternate fuel has been launched with cynical indifference to the dislocation this shift would cause to the world's food supply. The price of American corn has already begun to rise in the international grain market and this is because of the diversion of the corn produced to manufacture blended fuels kike ethanol. Brazil is another early pioneer in the research for blended fuels and there is signs of social unrest brought about by the large scale conversion of farmland for the production of corn for the fuel industry,

It is a fact of nature that the world's best farmlands are located in the northern hemisphere. The fast conversion of farmland to produce bio fuels is certain to create uncertainity in the sources of food supply. Having taken the oil from the Middle East there will
be nothing left in the OPEC countries and the middle east will have to import food from the countries of the temperate zone. In fact the Arab politicians have not woken up to the challenge posed by the innocuous quest for a substitute for petroleum.

The immediate danger lies in the shrinking of the worls food supply when large scale conversion of prime agricultural land into fuel plantation takes palce. And Asia and Africa will be the worst hit.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 26, 2007
Why is there no talk about pulling our own oil out of the ground. There is lots of it in ANWAR, in the shale hills of Colorado, and off multiple coast lines.

To me the first step is to open up safe drilling to pull out this oil. In the meantime using some of that money into wind, solar energy, and research on alternative fuels (like fuel cells, nuclear, etc) making them safe for civilian use. Maybe we will have to sit back and watch BP (British Petrol) show us how to do it.

I still stand firm that it will be a detriment to go after 'growing' our fuel. Another aspect yet to be mentioned is the water all the new municipalities are in need. The Arkansas river valley of SE colorado is reverting back to prarie because the farmers are selling their water to Denver Munis. This is reducing the amount of farmers due to lack of irigation water.
on Jun 26, 2007
(Citizen)Adventure-DudeJune 26, 2007 12:24:30Reply #22


It's obvious of course that's because of those enviromentalist people, but the irony is that while they don't want us to drill hear due to the possible destruction of the land and death of animals, it seems to be OK to do it in other parts of the world. Cause unless every one of these enviromental nutcases actually stays away from all types of technology and products that are derived of oil in some way which you can probably say just about everything, they are nothing but hypocrits as far as I'm concerned.
on Jun 26, 2007
they are nothing but hypocrits as far as I'm concerned.


And very near sited.
on Jun 26, 2007
hmmmm. First thought about the apparent lack of concern by some posters regarding the future crisis in world food supply. We should be concerned about countries shifting thier food growing potential to fuel crops. They will still need food, but they will then have to import it.

Let's think this out.

We start planting bio-fuel crops instead of food.
The price of fuel goes down....the price of food (now at a greater demand) goes up.

The law of supply and demand will hold true. Less food produced, for whatever reason....the price will jump. People won't drive less...what makes you think they will eat less?

An alternative source for fuel....drill Alaska. Continue to grow our own food. Invest in more efficient nuc. power to provide electricity...and use electric/hybrid cars.
on Jun 26, 2007
The price of fuel goes down....the price of food (now at a greater demand) goes up.


Economics say that these two will keep a balance.

You have the law of supply and demand right except that you have two commodities competing for each other. A farmer will play the game and plant what they think will yeild the most. Bottom line EVERYTHING goes up!
on Jun 26, 2007
Not to mention that we only can produce during harvest time. What are we going to do the rest of the year???? Bottle methane?
on Jun 26, 2007
*with great sarcasm* Hey why don't we build cars that run on Methane and grow pinto beans. We get food and our car gets fuel! Long trip? Car pool with in route meal. Oh yeah and also works as a cowboy bubble bath! Forget Hemp, BEANS! produces music, powers cars, creates luxurious baths!

VOTE BEANS!
on Apr 23, 2008

I wrote thisd in June 2007 and now what I predicted has come true, as usual.

on Apr 23, 2008
I wrote thisd in June 2007 and now what I predicted has come true, as usual.


Not exactly, but close enough for government work.

Those who did not have "greenies" in their eyes were predicting this as well. While we see the price of oil when we put gas in our car tanks, the price is rippling through the economy and causing world wide inflation. That is going to be painful to cure, but the alternative is a return to the 70s stagflation,and that must be avoided.
on Apr 23, 2008

Engineered bacteria that convert Co2 to octane would solve all the problems associated with corn ethenol and it's only a year away.

Link

2 Pages1 2