This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
U S A needs the WorldIn these presidential elections
Published on October 20, 2004 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
]In these presidential elections, more than ever before, issues of foreign policy have come to the foreground. The Bushmen never tire of speaking of the "Kerry Test" and they shamelessly insinuate that John Kerry proposes to hand over a "veto" on American foreign policy to the rest of the world. It is quite obviousthat John Kerry was referring to the creation of a broad concensus in the international community which would help in sustaining the policy. This is exactly what Kissenger, the Merrernich of the 20 th century, advocates in his book Diplomacy. Unilateralism in foreign policy is not only costly, but also damaging to the international standing of the only superpower in this world. There is a famous story iin the Aesop's fables which shows that even a lion,the king of the forest, needed the help of a humble mouse to escape from a trap of the hunter,a lesson well worth remembering. Bush and the Bushmen seem to regard unilateralism as a virtue but it is overextending the U S resources and its military. With nearly 150,000 men in Iraq where are the reserves for any major action in any other theatre of action such as North Korea. It is a sobering thought.
With less than three weeksleft for the election the electorate mustponder over the dangers of an overextended military and as
a sullen civil population which is just licking its wounds. Now the UK has been asked to help out. There are only 7650 British troops in southern Iraq and the British have lost less than 100 men in Iraq. With friends like this surely it is time to reconsider unilateralism as foreign policy.
[

Comments
on Oct 20, 2004
The Kerry Test and American Foreign Policy

By: Bahu Virupaksha
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 on Discussion on History and Politics
Message Board: Politics
]In these presidential elections, more than ever before, issues of foreign policy have come to the foreground. The Bushmen never tire of speaking of the "Kerry Test" and they shamelessly insinuate that John Kerry proposes to hand over a "veto" on American foreign policy to the rest of the world. It is quite obviousthat John Kerry was referring to the creation of a broad concensus in the international community which would help in sustaining the policy. This is exactly what Kissenger, the Merrernich of the 20 th century, advocates in his book Diplomacy. Unilateralism in foreign policy is not only costly, but also damaging to the international standing of the only superpower in this world. There is a famous story iin the Aesop's fables which shows that even a lion,the king of the forest, needed the help of a humble mouse to escape from a trap of the hunter,a lesson well worth remembering. Bush and the Bushmen seem to regard unilateralism as a virtue but it is overextending the U S resources and its military. With nearly 150,000 men in Iraq where are the reserves for any major action in any other theatre of action such as North Korea. It is a sobering thought.
With less than three weeksleft for the election the electorate mustponder over the dangers of an overextended military and as
a sullen civil population which is just licking its wounds. Now the UK has been asked to help out. There are only 7650 British troops in southern Iraq and the British have lost less than 100 men in Iraq. With friends like this surely it is time to reconsider unilateralism as foreign policy.


You know replying to your articles is a waste of time. You never respond to a reply. Why is that? Is it because your scared and you know that you don't have a leg to stand on?
on Oct 21, 2004
This is just not true. I have responded to all the posts on the site. I am not quite familiar with the technology and therefore may not be able to track each and every one of the comments. I try to answer all questions.As for the Kerry Test, surely 50 % of the population thik that he in no way undermined American foreign policy by advocating mulitaleral initiatives, and hence what Bush and the Bushmen have been saying is not just false but a calculated attempt at political fear mongering. Now who does not have a Leg to stand on.
on Oct 21, 2004

Reply #2 By: Bahu Virupaksha - 10/21/2004 12:13:40 AM
This is just not true. I have responded to all the posts on the site. I am not quite familiar with the technology and therefore may not be able to track each and every one of the comments. I try to answer all questions.As for the Kerry Test, surely 50 % of the population thik that he in no way undermined American foreign policy by advocating mulitaleral initiatives, and hence what Bush and the Bushmen have been saying is not just false but a calculated attempt at political fear mongering. Now who does not have a Leg to stand on.


Are you trying to say Kerry is not guility of the same fear mongering? Maybe you should go read the transcript of his speach in FL.
Here you go.


Sen. John Kerry Scares Seniors Into Thinking President Bush Will Privatize Social Security And Cut Their Benefits. “Just yesterday in the New York Times, President George W. Bush is quoted as saying to his national donors, to the richest people in America, next term when I get back in, I’m going to move quickly to privatize Social Security. Now, that’s a plan that he announced at the convention publicly, that he wants to allow young people to invest in the stock market. Now where are they going to invest it folks? In Worldcom, in Quest, in Enron, and what happens to the rest of the people in the system? Let me tell you , FDR created that system and it has worked all these years, Americans have a right to count on the money they have coming to them, and I will never privatize Social Security, I will never lower the benefits, and I will never raise the retirement age.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks In West Palm Beach, FL, 10/18/04)


ü New York Times Columnist Called Kerry’s Attack “Ludicrous … Stale And Transparent.” “On Monday, Kerry told seniors in Florida that Bush is plotting a ‘January surprise’ to cut their Social Security benefits by as much as 45 percent. ‘That's up to $500 a month less for food, for clothing, for the occasional gift for a grandchild.’ As Kerry knows, that's ludicrous – it's a stale and transparent canard that Democrats have brought out in election after election, to less and less effect. President Bush has not entertained and would not entertain any plan that cut benefits to seniors. Bush would sooner give up any Social Security reform than cut benefits.” (David Brooks, Op-Ed, “Kerry Off The Leash,” The New York Times, 10/19/04)

on Oct 21, 2004
John Kerry is talking about multilateral initiatives for the conduct of American foreign policy. In this he is right because unilateralism is a sure recipie to disaster as Iraq is showing. In the domestic agenda one may disagree with some of Kerry's ideas. For instance he does not have aclear plan for the revival of the economy nor does he say how he will improve the situation in Iraq. Therefore one can extend support to Kerry by taking the line lesser of the two difficulties.
on Oct 21, 2004

Reply #4 By: Bahu Virupaksha - 10/21/2004 1:28:26 AM
John Kerry is talking about multilateral initiatives for the conduct of American foreign policy. In this he is right because unilateralism is a sure recipie to disaster as Iraq is showing. In the domestic agenda one may disagree with some of Kerry's ideas. For instance he does not have aclear plan for the revival of the economy nor does he say how he will improve the situation in Iraq. Therefore one can extend support to Kerry by taking the line lesser of the two difficulties.


Sorry but you accused Bush of fear mongering and I showed instances of Kerry doing as bad or worse. Then you start off on multilateral initiatives. What gives? Please stay with what we were talking about.