This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
WILL THE USA ENFORCE ITS OWN LAW AGAINST THE POPE
Published on April 24, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
Cardinal Josef Ratzinger has been selected the Pope of the Roman Catholic denomination by his fellow cardinals. Being an arch conservative, he is probably the best man to succeed the late pope, John Paul II. The great American historian, David Goldhagen in his book the Moral Reckoning refers to this particular pope in one of his chapters. Even the meticulous research by this Princeton trained historian did not lead to the discovery of the singgular fact that Ratzinger spent his entire youth as a card holding member ogf the Nazi youth wing. After his capture by the Americans in 1945 he resurfaced as a catholic priest. The point that David Goldhaen makes in the book cited above is that the higher establishment of the Catholic Church collaboreted with the Nazis during World War II. Not only that the banks and other financial establishments of the Roman Catholic church gained considerably by illegally acquiring the savings and other assets of the Jews who were being sent to the gas chambers by the Germans. In an earlier work, Goldhagen had shown that the guilt for the Holocaust rests with all Germans and not just with the SS and the members of the Nazi Party. Now that the truth of Pope Benedict XVI association with the Nazis has surfaced, it is time that the Roman Catholic Church is called to account for its criminal misdeeds right from the time of the Inquisition till the Holocaust. Violence, Greed and Crime have marched hand in hand with the padres of the Roman faith.

This brings me to another point. Soon after the defeat of Germany the US congress passed a Law banning the entry of Nazis into the territory of the USA. USA has surrendered nazis to Israeel even after they had acquired US citizenship, on the ground that a Nazi past made then ineligible to step foot on the soil of the USA. I am not veru sure whether this is the best way to de toxify a Nazi past, but the Law stands on the statute book. Will the Secretary of State dr Condoleeza Rice invoke this law to deny entry to Cardinal Ratninger in his new avatatra as a Catholic Pope. Afterall, Mark Tatcher was denied entry for a far lesser crime.

Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 26, 2005
"Greman gult is collective "


By all means, then the Palestinians should be cut loose and lose their right to any land because they are surely ALL tangibly responsible for the anti-Semitic attacks on Israel. They march in support of the groups that undertake them, they chant "Death to America, Death to Isreal" in the streets. They must all hate Jews, right? Well, Israel had best just nip that situation in the bud and ship them all to the Hague, I guess.

By Bahu's Decree, no Palestinian may ever have basic relations with the United States. If what you say is true, then we should have just bombed Iraq to oblivion and ignored any sort of rebuilding, because everyone there was responsible for what was done by Hussein. We should immediately apply the "do not fly" list to any native Iraqi or Afghani.

If the German guilt is collective, then Arab guilt is even more foul since they don't live under threats if they don't adopt anti-Semitic attitudes. They just hate naturally, I suppose. Pakistani guilt is collective, to and Indian guilt is collective, and every Chinese person alive in the 50's and 60's are responsible for the millions purged.

This suits your argument here, but you are a hypocrite in that you WON'T apply your draconian standard of guilt to those hating and killing Jews and other ethnic groups TODAY. Hypocrite.
on Apr 26, 2005
Hypocrite.


Baker...don't you think IDIOT is a more appropriate term in this case?
on Apr 26, 2005
"Baker...don't you think IDIOT is a more appropriate term in this case?


No, because Bahu, though I rarely agree with him, is usually very intelligent. In this case his intelligence has just been overwhelmed by his paranoid bigotry.
on Apr 27, 2005
This suits your argument here, but you are a hypocrite in that you WON'T apply your draconian standard of guilt to those hating and killing Jews and other ethnic groups TODAY. Hypocrite.Bonus Rating: Trolling Insightful


Since I personally believe in Israel's right to statehood and I also happen to maintain that Israel has a spiritual destiny to fulfill I will not stand for any anisemitism. I think you are making a big mistake when you equate the political broblems in West Asia, particularly those between the State of Israel and the Arab States with anti semitism..Remember the Arabs are also a semitic race, and Arab hating is as much antisemitism as Jew baiting. Having said this I must revet back to the original idea behind my write up:the guilt of the Grermans as a fundamentally antisemetic people who were responsuible for the Holocaust. Do not mistake me to be an apologist for Isalmic Terrorism when I say that the violence in the Middle East is two way and blaming just the Arabs wont do. Yes political and moral judgements are not a straight black and white affair. I do see shades of grey in much of this but HYPOCRITE I am Not.
on Apr 27, 2005
If you don't see anti-Semitism in popular Arab media and propaganda, if you don't see it brandished openly, then not only are you a hypocrite, you are blind.

Hitler had a "cause", too, a deranged, unjust one, granted, but I personally think much of the sublimated Arab cause in relation to Israel is just as deranged. You know as well as I do that there are untold numbers of Arabs that would start the ovens again if they had the chance, they say so openly.

The roots of much of what we have now in the middle east was steeped in WW2, and many noteworthy Arabs aligned themselves with Hitler. The Grand Mufti was a darling of Egypt, hailed by Arafat as a hero of the Palestinian people, and espoused the mass slaughter of Jews.

Another monster who came later, Edi Amin, praised Hitler, wanted to erect a statue in his honor, praised the holocaust, and lived on a pension in Saudi Arabia until the day he died, safe from prosecution.

I think you need to re-evaluate the situation. You have one the one hand a Pope who has never made an anti-Semitic statement, and who you have no proof ever raised a finger to harm a Jew. On the other hand you have nations full of people who would gladly slaughter them given the chance, and whose leaders not only sympathized with the Nazi cause, but can be traced back to direct alignments to it.
on Apr 27, 2005
Outside of speculation and hatemongering, the only thing you have here is your supposed law. Now, you don't cite the law, you don't even quote the law.

I believe even if there is such a law, it wouldn't apply to this Pope, or people like him. Since you are making an accusation, perhaps you'd like to back it up.
3 Pages1 2 3