JACKSON DESRRVES TO WIN

STENTON MUST PAY FOR HIS VENDEDATTA AGAINST JACKSON

Published on June 14, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events

Michael Jackson, the Sultann of Pop, has won his legal battle and there is no doubt that the charges were trumped up. Jackson rightly said in one of his sdongs:Stenton is a hard man. However, Neverland, will never be the same again. The trial and the media hype against Jackson all mean that Michael Jackson will,have to work hard to reinvent himself. The iconic status of Jackson has actually been reinforced by this victory. We were sure that he was innocent and prayed the he will walk free. The procecution has used unethical tactics in order to nail Jackson. Calling former, disgruntled employees to testify, trying to bring as witnesses even those who benefitted through the generosity of Jackson all smacked of a personal grudge against Jackson. The Stentton Man who was responsible for this chilling percecution and procesution of Jackson must be punished for porofessional misconduct and misuse of public office against the greatest Pop Star after Elvis. The incredibly talented Jackson will be able to ressurect his music even after this mad deluge of charges. GOD BLESS M JACKSON

Comments (Page 1)

ParaTed2k

on Jun 14, 2005

Yes, Michael Jackson is enormously talented, however, he is also a child molester and a freak of sideshow proportions.

He deserved to win this one, not because he definitely did any of the 10 crimes for which he was tried or because he didn't... the world may never know the truth on that. He deserves to win for one basic reason. The prosecution did too poor a job to leave the jury with reasonable doubt.

Stenton may have a personal vendetta against Jackson. That doesn't take away from the fact that kiddy porn was found at Neverland and there were kids fingerprints in adult mags.

Sorry, but no 40 (or even 30) something should be allowed to sleep in a bed with kids who aren't directly related. Words that would describe Michael Jackson are, "Talented", "Freak" & "Pervert".

Manopeace

on Jun 14, 2005

there is no doubt that the charges were trumped up.

The only thing that was 'trumped up' in this case was his organ! The 'man' obviously has a lifestyle worthy of being punished in some way.

kingbee

on Jun 14, 2005

Words that would describe Michael Jackson are, "Talented", "Freak" & "Pervert".

or 'oscar wilde' for short.

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jun 14, 2005

, Michael Jackson is enormously talented, however, he is also a child molester and a freak of sideshow proportions.

In spite of the best effort of Mr seddon he has been acquitted. The jury found him innocent and I think it is unfair to hound Jackson on the basis of false and motivated chazrges.

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jun 14, 2005

Since I find you to be a fairly despicable person yourself, Bahu, it doesnt suprise me in the least to see you idolizing someone like Michael

I do not understand how yopu can say such nasty things. Surely you do not mean what you write. Jackson was not tried for being weird or for having an alternate life style. He was tried on charges of child abuse:The Jury found him innocent. The matter rests there., Little Whip.

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jun 14, 2005

Since I find you to be a fairly despicable person yourself, Bahu, it doesnt suprise me in the least to see you idolizing someone like Michael

MythicalMino

on Jun 14, 2005

heh....

the guy himself has admitted to sleeping in a bed with young boys.....

Now...let me ask this question:

If a priest (or, preacher) was to admit to doing that....the guy would be tossed into prison so fast, God's head would spin.

child molestation is child molestation no matter who did it, no matter how wierd the guy is who is doing it, and no matter how "popular" the guy is who is doing it......

Personally, I find it pretty disgusting. For a grown man to desire to sleep with young boys....something is seriously wrong in the brain waves....of both the man and the poor kids' parents.

InfoGeek

on Jun 14, 2005

The Jury found him innocent.

Actually they found him not guilty. which means he could have done it but that there was a reasonable doubt that he didn't.

IG

Island Dog

on Jun 14, 2005

In spite of the best effort of Mr seddon he has been acquitted. The jury found him innocent and I think it is unfair to hound Jackson on the basis of false and motivated chazrges.

Just because you were found not guilty, does not mean you didn't actually commit the crime. He admittly sleeps with little boys. It's amazing how Jackson supporters overlook this.

Manopeace

on Jun 14, 2005

It's amazing how Jackson supporters overlook this.

if MJ was an athlete, would his supporters be called 'athletic supporters'?

InfoGeek

on Jun 14, 2005

if MJ was an athlete, would his supporters be called 'athletic supporters'?

How about "Jacko straps"?

IG

bakerstreet

on Jun 14, 2005

not guilty does not mean innocent. Anyone who allows their child to associate with this guy from this point on is an idiot that doesn't deserve kids.

Reiki-House

on Jun 14, 2005

He's a molester but maybe not in this particular case. One problem for the prosecution is how the multiple-lawsuits-against-celebrities-gold digging plaintiff would drive her son to Jackson's home. Talk about enabling. And one has to wonder if the gross mother was hoping he would be molested so she could cash in. Laughter.

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jun 15, 2005

forget that Jackson isnt the victim here, he is the accused. The true victims are the kids.
Bonus Rating: Trolling Insightful
not guilty does not mean innocent. Anyone who allows their child to associate with this guy from this point on is an idiot that doesn't deserve kids.
I think Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence is anot inquisitorial like Roman Jurisprudence and hencethe Virdict "NOT GUILTY" is the declaration of INNOCENE. Little Whip and Baker Street remenmber that ebven misdemenour chargesd were not maintained. In fact the jurors seem to think thast Jackson was set upon by Seddon for reasons best left alone. Now Jackson will bring a civil law suit and let us see what happens. Sure, sleeping with boys is not done but MJ did not abuse them, MJ is a victim of a mind set that does not let Black people shine.

drmiler

on Jun 15, 2005

#17 by Bahu Virupaksha
Wednesday, June 15, 2005

I think Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence is anot inquisitorial like Roman Jurisprudence and hencethe Virdict "NOT GUILTY" is the declaration of INNOCENE. Little Whip and Baker Street remenmber that ebven misdemenour chargesd were not maintained. In fact the jurors seem to think thast Jackson was set upon by Seddon for reasons best left alone. Now Jackson will bring a civil law suit and let us see what happens. Sure, sleeping with boys is not done but MJ did not abuse them, MJ is a victim of a mind set that does not let Black people shine.

Notice the difference between the two words? Not guilty is NOT the same as innocent!

One entry found for guilty.

Main Entry: guilty
Pronunciation: 'gil-tE
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): guilt·i·er; -est
1 : justly chargeable with or responsible for a usually grave breach of conduct or a crime

Main Entry: in·no·cent
Pronunciation: 'i-n&-s&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin innocent-, innocens, from in- + nocent-, nocens wicked, from present participle of nocEre to harm -- more at NOXIOUS
1 a : free from guilt or sin especially through lack of knowledge of evil :

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!