This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
There is no need for Hot Air
Published on August 16, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
Admiral William Leahy, a great seaman and the first Admiral to have been the US joint Chiegfs of Staff, said : It is my opinion thast the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender... Similarly General Dwight Eisenhower stated and I quote his own words: .. I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was , I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. These two quote from heroes who faught and won the war for the USA should set at rest those idle minds that presumed to teach me history. But my purpose is far more serious than merely responding to a few impertinent comments made as replies to my serious piece on the Hiroshima Tragedy.

The Files and Papers relating to the Decision of President Truman to use the Atomic Bomb against Japan in August 1945 have been recently declassified and with the Help of the Freedom of Information Act all details pertaining to this issue can be verified. Instead of reading the documents that are avasilable in the Harry L Stimson and Harry Truman Web Sites, I was shocked that some cooments turned quite nasty and even questioned the motives for writing this important piece.

The first point that I would like to deal with relates to the oft repeated justification for dropping the Atomic Bombs: that is shortened the War and saved American lives aas the Japanese were in no mood to surrender. That this myth still persists 60 years after the end of the War shows that the Media is doing a good job in perpetuating such self serving illusions. In fact the very appointment of Admiral Susuki as Prime Minister itslf was a signal sent by Japan that the militarists are no longer in control. Kantaro Susuki was a well known anti militarist and the Office of Strategic Services had in a routine report submitted to the Joint Inelligence Committee had this to say and I quote from the report: Japan's main rail lines are already overburdened while motor transport is totally inadequate. The continued heavy destruction of machinery and equipment will make it impossible for Japan to replace her losses... Japan's will to continue tthe war may be expected tomweaken progressively." This repot was submitted to the President soon after the capture of Okinawa. Repeatedly in the official records we have evidence to show that the military suituation was getting desparate and Japan ran out of its Petroleum stockpile by the middle of 1944 making the military chaff at its bit.

The Question that now arises did the American political leadership know about the situation in Japan and ithe increasing pressure to surrender that was being felt. Since the Japanese diplomatic codes had been broken the American leadership was quite aware from April 1 1945 when the Japanese ambassador to Soviet Union cabled his foreign office that the Soviets under Stalin will abrogate their nuetrality pact. A secret report recently declassified states in clear terms: If at any time the USSR should enter the war,all Japanese will realise that absolute defeat is inevitable. Toward this end Roosevelt at Postdam requested the Soviet dictator Stalin to declare war on Japan and Stalin had agreed. The Japanese too knew that Stalin had made up his mind to recover the Shakalin and Kuril Islands that Japan had seized in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904. Hence with the Soviet factor coming into play there was no need to use the Bomb. The real reason, therefore seems to browbeat the Soviets into accepting American terms in the settlemntt of the post war Europe. The Bomb was dropped inorder to intimidate the Soviets and the defenceless men, women and childredn of Hiroshima and Nagasaki paid with their lives for this piece of skullduggery.

The next question relates to the alternatives to the use of the Bomb. Did Truman have at his disposal realistic alternatives that would haver enabled him to win the War and disengage the other diplomatic factors. Samuel Walker, a conservative historian of the US NUclear Regulatory Commission had stated:Alternatives to the Bomb existed and Truman and his advisers knew it(sic).Even before Potsdam an intercepted telegram that was put up before the President on July 12 1945 has these words written in the handwriting og Truman in the margin; telegram from the Jap[anese] Emperor asking for peace. This is a full three weekks before the Hiroishima bombing."

Comments
on Aug 16, 2005
Admiral William Leahy

It is unfortunate that not he but the Japanese military had to be convinced to surrender.

It is, however, a fact that the Japanese fought on until the nuclear disaster hit and refused to surrender even after the first drop. And the Japanese emperor himself blamed the nuclear bombs for his decision.

Why it would have been better to let the Japanese kill more Chinese and the Americans to kill more Japanese in further firebombings and an eventual invasion, is beyond my understanding.
on Aug 25, 2005
Did Japan Sue for Peace Prior to Dropping Atom Bomb?

Some say that the atomic bombs should not have been dropped on Japan as “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender” and that “The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace”. However, just because one can quote a statement that does not make it so. It is specious to suggest the Japanese were ready to surrender. Even after the second atomic bomb, Nagasaki August 9, 1945, the Imperial Council voted against surrendering. It took up to another 1,000 B-29 conventional bombing raids for Japan to surrender on August 15th.

From my high school studies, I know that the Potsdam Declaration on July 26, 1945 demanded that the Japanese surrender immediately or face "prompt and utter destruction." The Japanese government rejected this on July 28, Prime Minister Suzuki announced they would ignore ("mokatsu") the Declaration.

U.S intelligence knew about the internal struggle between the militarists, and those in the Japanese government wanting to seek a negotiated peace, but 1) the militarist always held the upper hand, and 2) Franklin Roosevelt’s policy was to demand an unconditional surrender.

The deciphering of messages between Tokyo and the Japanese Embassy in Moscow and gave the United States knowledge of the Japanese peace initiative in the spring of 1945 rejecting "unconditional surrender" and expecting significant concessions. Deciphering Japanese military communications revealed in the summer of 1945 that the Japanese had achieved an alarming buildup of forces preparing to fight to the bitter end.

Five days after Nagasaki the militarists still wanted to fight on, however, the Emperor Hiroito instructed his cabinet to accept the Allied terms immediately, explaining "I cannot endure the thought of letting my people suffer any longer"; if the war did not end "the whole nation would be reduced to ashes." The Minister of War, General Anami Korechika obeyed the Emperor and then committed seppuku on August 15, 1945, the day of Hiroito’s broadcast announcing Japan's surrender.

The Naval Blockade suggestion that it would have been preferable to starve the Japanese women and children until the militarists gave in is a real hoot.

See prior www.FelderLaguna.Blogspot.com post U.S. Presidential Aspirants Should Answer if They Would Have Used Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki For an opposing point of view see critical comment there.
on Aug 25, 2005
I have asked this before but you never even bothered to answer. So I'll try again.

Do you even know "where" the nuclear material came from to make the bombs? It didn't come from us, we didn't have enough fissionable material to do it. No, it came from a "German" submarine that was bound for for....(wait for it)......JAPAN! If Germany had not surrendered when it did the material would have ended up in Japanese hands. After Germany surrendered the sub captain brought his sub in and surrendered it to us without finishing his journey. Now do you honestly think that Japan would not have used the material to make their own bombs and drop them on the US? After what they did at Pearl? I mean come on now. They attacked "before" any formal declaration of war was announced! "If" you do not think Japan would not have used it on the US, I have some beach front property in Arizona to sell you.
on Aug 29, 2005


I have read Rhodes a standard History of the Atomic Bomb and he mentions no such event.
on Aug 29, 2005
a german submarine, carrying about 1200 lbs of uranium oxide to japan, allowed itself to be captured after receiving notification the nazis had surrendered. since hitler had stopped all nuclear weapons research in 1940 and the nazis never produced refined fissionable material, it was hardly ready for bomb production. nobody knows for sure where it ended up. it's possible oppenheimer took control of it. if so, it may also be possible some was used to construct the bomb that was detonated over nagasaki. possible doesn't = fact.