This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
VIOLATION OF GENEVA CONVENTION BY COALITION TROOPS
Published on November 15, 2005 By Bahu Virupaksha In Current Events
It is a delicious bit of irony that the ostensible reason for American invasion of Iraq remains the ABC weapons allegedly developed by Saddam Hussein. It has now become abundantly clear that not only was the intelligence with respect of the WMD program of the erstwhile President of Iraq flawed but there appears to have been what one senator delicately called "cherry picking ." So a savage brutal war was waged against a nation which was down on its heels due to the UN sanctions. The people of Iraq have been crushed under two oppressive regimes:One the warlord regime of Saddam Hussein and the "shoot and scoot"wild west regime of the Anglo-Saxon coalition troops. We have during the course of the last one year catalogued the awful story of the travails the ordinary Iraqi living outside of the Grren Zone is expriencing.

USA is a signatory of the Geneva Convention which bans the use of chemical weapons. In fact one of the charges that the regime in Bagdad has levelled against Saddam Hussein pertains to the use of a chemical against the Shiaa population in the South of the country at the end of the I st Gulf War. According to the Reprt prepared by William R Brankowitz of the US Army Chemical Materials Agency, a classified document printed for private circulation with security clearance,the USA dumped 7,346 canisters of a banned chemical White Phosphorous in the Atlantic Ocean in order to comply with the Geneva Convention against the use of Chemical Weapons.. Along with WP 421,157 pounds of radiological waste and 20 drums of cyanide were sunk in the Atlantic Ocean btween 1962 to 1989.

What is disturbing is the growing evidence that in thwe assault on Fallujah last year( extensively covered on our blog) the US troops used White Phosphorous against civillian population. Clincs in and around Fallujah treated hundreds of people including children with severe burns and lesions of the skin caused by exposure to the chemical. The patriotic "embedded journalists" who reproduce uncritically the lies dished out by the Bush and the Bushmen did not once report the use of the banned chemical in the American media. The world got wind of the use of the blatant violation of the Geneva Convention from the Italian Press.The Italian TV aired a documentary feature produced by Sigfrido Ramicci and Maurizio Torrealta where shocking visuals of the horrendous damage done by the indiscriminate use of WP are given.A web site called globalsecurity.org WP results in "painful chemkical burn injuries".This chemical burns the skin right up to the demal level and leaves the clothes intact. This is because the chemical is used as a highly lipis solution.

The response of the US state department to this war crime has been as expected flat denial followed by the most fraudlent of excuses. The use of the WP for illumination of the battle field is permitted and so the State Department spokeperson claimed the WP was used only as a battle field illuminator. Even the US battle manual ST100-3 permits the use of WP only as a smokescreen. Yet in complete violation of its own Internation obligations, and with total inhumanity to the Arab population, the Coalition used banned chemicals in an illegal outlaw manner in an illegal war of occupation.

Thinking Americans must write to their Senators and Congressmen asking for a bipartisan Inquiry into the conduct of the Fallujah assault.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 15, 2005
White Phospherous isn't mentioned by the Geneva convention, though some interpret its abilities as a incendiary agent to be against it. By that standard, any incendiary would be against the geneva convention; moreso, almost any weapon can be skewed to appear to be banned by it.

So, you're the one doing the cherry picking, since incendiary agents are used almost universally, and have been in every war. I wonder why you pick the US, and this war in particular, to have a problem with them? Hmmm...

"So a savage brutal war was waged against a nation which was down on its heels due to the UN sanctions."


I'd remind you that this "savage" war was intended to get the Iraqi people out from under sanctions, whereas all the "peace loving" nations wanted to prolong them indefinately while they made millions in oil-for-food scams.
on Nov 15, 2005
More know-nothing propaganda to keep all the know nothings of the world busy feigning outrage.

NEXT!
on Nov 15, 2005
I'd remind you that this "savage" war was intended to get the Iraqi people out from under sanctions, whereas all the "peace loving" nations wanted to prolong them indefinately while they made millions in oil-for-food


May I remind you that the justification for the war war the WMD which were never found. USA waged the war on the basis of flawed reports and love for the well being of the Iraqis had nothing to do with it.

Use of WP against civilizns is forbidden and the issue is identical with the use od napalm and agent oraange during the other forgotten war.
on Nov 15, 2005
More know-nothing propaganda to keep all the know nothings of the world busy feigning outrage.


I am sorry that you should say such an unkind statement.
on Nov 15, 2005
May I remind you that the justification for the war war the WMD which were never found.


May I remind you that WMD was but 1 of 4 reasons for returning to hostilities with Hussein. Might I also remind you that if the "peace loving" countries of the world had their way, the UN would still be sponsoring the murders and rapes in Iraq (under the quise of the "oil for food" program)?

More know-nothing propaganda to keep all the know nothings of the world busy feigning outrage.


I am sorry that you should say such an unkind statement.


I'm sorry that you feel that way, perhaps if you would learn a few things about White Phosphorous, what constitutes WMD and what doesn't, or even what Geneva considers "chemical" weapons; then you won't have to come off as a "know nothing" before you feign outrage.
on Nov 15, 2005
Education time BV,

M15 White Phosphorous grenade
The M15 White Phosphorous grenade is a bursting type grenade used for signaling, screening, and incendiary purposes.

(1) Body -- sheet metal.

(2) Filler -- 15 ounces of white phosphorus.

(3) Fuze -- M206A2.

(4) Weight -- 31 ounces.

(5) Capabilities -- the average soldier can throw the grenade 30 meters. The grenade has a bursting radius of 17 meters. All friendly personnel within this 17-meter area should be in a covered position to avoid being struck by burning particles. The WP filler burns for about 60 seconds at a temperature of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. This intense heat causes the smoke produced by the grenade to rise quite rapidly, especially in cool climates. This makes the M15 grenade less desirable for use as a screening agent.

(6) Color/markings -- grey with one yellow band and yellow markings.

(7) First aid -- treat burns caused by WP in the same way as ordinary burns. If particles of WP are embedded in the flesh, immerse the wound in water or pack with wet cloths to halt combustion. Then pick out or squeeze out the WP. The particles will reignite spontaneously if allowed to dry. Apply copper sulphate solution to halt combustion of the WP particles. This permits them to be removed without igniting.

The military has been and will continue to use these grenades. They are not used to wound or kill civilians, we use them for signaling, light source, or smoke. We shoot them out of grenade lanchers, and throw them (about 30 meters is max accurate). Before you belive everything you read on sites like globalsecuirty.org, you should follow up with research on what it is they are talking about and who is doing the talking.

www.Globalsecurity is a good site, if you look at ALL the information. Here is there own web page describing what you are tlaking about: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/wp.htm

Also there is a follow up to your article, and shows your information comes from, are you ready? The Christian Science Monitor.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2005/051110-iraq-cw.htm

The fllow up clearly shows that CIVILIANS were not targeted and the WP grenades were used to flush out the terrorist so they could then be killed when they got them into the open. A good sound, effective use of proper military techniques. Good job you ask me.

on Nov 15, 2005
Every time someone whines about the tens of thousands of children who were suffering and dying while Hussein made himself and all the peaceniks wealthy under sanctions, they give ample reason for this war, Bahu. The only people with hangups about WMDs are people who would have opposed the war no matter what reason was given.
on Nov 15, 2005
The fllow up clearly shows that CIVILIANS were not targeted and the WP grenades were used to flush out the terrorist so they could then be killed when


This is not true. WP was used against civillians and then the justification trotted out was the presence of terrorists. In any event the Terrorists have not signed the Geneva Convention while the USA has and therefore is bound by lasw to follow iNTERNATIONAL lAW.
on Nov 16, 2005
This is not true. WP was used against civillians and then the justification trotted out was the presence of terrorists. In any event the Terrorists have not signed the Geneva Convention while the USA has and therefore is bound by lasw to follow iNTERNATIONAL lAW.


So first you use an article from Globalsecury.org as your sorce for a factual news article, then the same site post 2 more articles giving more details about the article you chose, someone points out the articles and says that they contradict everything you say the article says and now you say that it's all lies?

So what are we suppose to believe? You gave use the website

A web site called globalsecurity.org WP results in "painful chemkical burn injuries".This chemical burns the skin right up to the demal level and leaves the clothes intact. This is because the chemical is used as a highly lipis solution.


Now you say it's a lie. Make up your mind. Your just as sad as Col Gene is when it comes to trying to find ways to make the US look bad. Micheal Moore did a better job than you guys have and even he sucked at it.
on Nov 17, 2005
. Your just as sad as Col Gene is when it comes to trying to find ways to make the US look bad. Micheal Moore did a better job than you guys


The Department of Defence has now owned up to using WP in Fallujah though they are still in denial mode as far as civillian casualities is concerned. That is why an independent credible international investigation into the Fallujah assault in October Novermbver of 2004 is called for.
on Nov 17, 2005
What exactly do you think war is, bahu? Do the nations you root for use magic bullets that only harm the bad guys? I doubt you are this ignorant of history or of war.
on Nov 17, 2005
Nope, Bahu would kiss a terrorist and welcome him in to brag about how many Americans he killed... while at the same time crying crocodile tears over everyone else.
on Nov 17, 2005
What exactly do you think war is, bahu? Do the nations you root for use magic bullets that only harm the bad guys? I doubt you are this ignorant of history or of war.


He's just being pretentious like virtually every other left-wing anti-war(US) demagogue. You and I may disagree greatly on Iraq, Bakerstreet, but both of us want the US to come out looking like the winner she is.
on Nov 17, 2005
We probably don't even disagree that much on Iraq, either, GP, that's the sad part. Bahu honestly wouldn't differ so much with either of us, either.

It mainly depends on what people think the threat is NOW. Bahu, and many who oppose the war see Bush as a threat, so they work to oppose that which threatens them. It's a nasty game of three card monty, fueled not by military, but economic competition.

The propaganda that fueled all this hate was spouted by interests who believed opposing the US would make them money in Iraq and the Middle East, first in the oil-for-food scam, and later when the sanctions were removed and Hussein could spend all that cash. Now they hope to regain their foothold by making the US as unsavory to the people who remain as possible. When new deals replace the old ones, they don't want America to have their foot in the door.

It is biting them on the ass, though, because the brainwashed don't just turn on America, they turn on Western culture, Western culture even turns on itself. It's happening in France, it is happening here, it will happen more and more as long as the West continues this sad self-loathing and refuses to stand up for itself.
on Nov 17, 2005
Nope, Bahu would kiss a terrorist and welcome him in to brag about how many Americans he killed


I JUST WILL NOT DO THAT FOR THE SIMPLE REASON I OPPOSE ISLAMIC TERRORISM. But two wrongs do not make a right. Just because there are terrorists out there does not mean that US military can use unacceptable means of warfare.[
2 Pages1 2