This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
The spreading fire in the Middle East
Published on July 21, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
Isaac Deutcher, the Jewish historian whose entire family perished in the Holocaust made the following observation after the end of the 1967 six day war with the Arab states: "To justify or condone Israel's wars against the Arabs is to render Israel a very bad service and harm its own long term interests". This statement is relevant today as Israel in a blaze of military tiumphalim is close to achieving abbolute mastery over Lebanon. The unrestrained use of firepower, and the highly self righteous rhetoric from Israeli leaders and the undercurrent of racist antagonism against the Arab population and the callous disregatrd for Arab lives--women and children-- not excluded.. all suggest that Israel is using the opportunity provided by the war on terror and the disturbed conditions prevaileing in the region to redraw the boundries to its advantage.

The offensive againt Hamas in Palestine has already cost hundreds of lives and now the war against Lebanon. Hamas, a Sunni outfit and Hizbollah a Shiaa outfit have now joined hands.. It is possible that Israeli military offensive could completely jeopardise the stability of the present regime and the large scale violence and bloodshed unleashed by Israel makes the Lebones population yearn for the days of Syrian occupation. The Maronite Christian and the Druze population were at the forefront of the struggle against Syria aznd having rid Lebanon of Syria, the people find themselves under seige by land, air and sea from a far more ruthless adversary. The Western powers used the pretext provided by the killing of Rafik Hariri to exple the Syrians from Lebanon and the Bekaab Valley. Now the world can see for itself the real gameplan behind the killing of Rafik Hiriri and the expulsion of the Syrians.

The military operations against the Hizbollah will only serve to intensify the problem in the middle east. A parallel with Iraq is obvious. Just as US occupation of Iraq fuelled an isurgency that has now gone out of control, the Israeli presence in SDouthern Lebanon will only intensify the resistance. Isral has gone in for prisoner swaps earlier, why not now. Obviously it wants to use this opportunity to consolodate itself in souther Lebanon and create what it calls a "buffer zone" there. USA has shown lack of political understanding when on the one hand it admits that Israel has used dispropotionate force against the civilian population and on the other uses the threat of veto on the question of a UN sponsored ceasefire

Is rthere any evidence that Iran has instigated the Hizbollah in order to divert attention from the nuclear tangle? In fact the dispropotionate use of air power against the civilian population by Israel itself will be a major talking point that Israel and the USA understand only the language of military might making the solution of the issue more difficult. So far Israel has provided no information about a possible Iranian link except the inuendo that since Hizbollah is a Shiaa organisation it must be a surrogate of the Iran. The logic of such statements is similar to Joseph Macarthy's famous aphorism" It walks like a duck, squacks like a duck so it must be a duck. Unfortunately the Iranian angle to this crisis has not been established. Syria is belamed for everything that happens in Lebanon. In fact it was Syria that brought peace to the war torn country and inspite of the UN intervention it has not been establishe that Syria was involved in the Rafik Hiriri assasination. The Katuysha rockets are of Soviet vintage and there are no signs of direct military support to Hizbollah by Syria. It is obvious that Israel is making thse accusations in order to widen the amit of conflict and draw the US directly into armed confrontation with Iran.

The response of the Arab nations to this unfolding catastrophe has been timid, tepid and spineless. Of course there is no love lost between the Arab powers and the Hizbollah but when Arabs are being killed in such numbers it is a shameless act of perfidy on the part of Arab Governments to remain silent spectators. However on the ground there is overwhelming suppot for the victims of Israeli aggression and that is a dangerous factor in the violent social and political undercurrents of the Middle East.

USA must suppot a ceasefire as desired by the government of Lebanon in the interes of peace and to stem a spiralling humanitarian cris in the region."

Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jul 21, 2006
A unilateral cease fire is called surrender.  And that is all it would be as Hezbollah shows no signs of stopping as long as there is any life left in them.
on Jul 21, 2006
I think it was John Bolton that said "How do you get terrorists to agree to a cease fire". Considering the stated aim of the Islamic jihad is to completely destroy the infidels, I don't think you can reasonably expect that agreement.
on Jul 21, 2006
I have always found it disturbing that this kind of situation can be linked to any kind of fighting situation. Exp: A bully can terrorize a school for an entire year and get no more than detention, as soon as the victim stands up for him/herself they usually end up going to court and in most, cases that I have seen, getting expulsed from the school. Is it fair for someone to be a bully to many and get away with it while those who stand up for themselves get the short end of the stick?

WHY CEASEFIRE IS IN ISRAEL'S INTEREST


Since when is it more beneficial for the pounder to stop hitting the one being pounded? I would think that the one being pounded is the one to benefit from a halt on their beating.
on Jul 21, 2006
The civilian authorities in Lebanon aren't being accidentally attacked Bahu. They've officially allowed Hezbollah to control their southern areas, embraced them as 'national resistance' and even absorbed them to a limited degree into their government and military. Obviously while Hezbollah is an agent of Iran and Syria, they are working in Lebanon at the behest of the Lebanese.

Given that, what would a cease fire accomplish? Hezbollah will not cease firing for long, and then you'll be right back in the same position. We had eight years of your attitude ruling they day, with Clinton proudly shaking hands with terrorists like Arafat. Where did it get us? It just gave terrorist organizations and the nations that support them eight years of unfettered 'me time'.

So, no, we've been down that road, and it doesn't go anywhere. Israel sits down time and again with Palestinians, calls for a cease fire, and before they can turn their back a different terrorist group struts into a wedding party. They pull out of settlements so that the next week they can be used as launching points for attacks.

No more trading inches for miles, thanks. People who support terrorists need to learn that they might have to suffer right along with them.
on Jul 21, 2006
what happens when extreme heat meets sand? GLASS....Glass in the desert would be very pretty......
on Jul 21, 2006
I don't think Israel should stop until the entire nation of Lebanon is under sand and dust....same with Palestine....

We can cry and moan all day long about the "horrible loss of innocent civilian life"....Bahu...where were your tears when the terrorist bastards were blowing up Israelis? You had none....same with Col. Gene, KB, and any other liberal that is trying make excuses for why Israel should stop what they are doing.

I say, blow the crap out of any Arab nation that houses terrorist....and don't stop until there are no more Arabs...er, Terrorist....

I have said it before...to deal properly with the Terrorist bastards, you have to deal in extremes...and if we are not willing to deal in extremes...then buckle up and hold on to your butts...we are gonna lose.

Extreme Force is the only language the Terrorist bastards understand...I say we speak to them in their own language....Eventually, there won't be anymore arabs for the terrorists bastards to recruit....
on Jul 21, 2006
one day I hope your neighbors start throwing eggs at your home, everyday eggs, everytime your clean them more eggs, eggs day and night, eggs on your wife and kids, eggs on your mother and father, eggs on all your family, day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.. let us see how you react.
on Jul 21, 2006
I dunno.

The last ceasefire with Hezb'Allah left a well-armed guerrilla army on Israel's northern border. Recent events strongly suggest that cease-fires are NOT in Israel's interest at all, and that only the delivery of savage beatings will solve the problem.
on Jul 21, 2006
I love it when the loons completely blame Israel and act like the terrorists are the victims. How sad.
on Jul 22, 2006
A unilateral cease fire is called surrender. And


Not a unilateral ceasefire but as the US itself has asked of Israel Restrait". If there are difficulties with the term ceasefire, Kofi Anan has suggested, cessation of hostilities.

How do you get terrorists to agree to a cease fire". Considering the stated aim of the Islamic jihad is to completely destroy the infidels, I don't think you can reasonably expect that agreement


There are politcal problems in the Misddle East like the unsettled Palestine issue that fuels the crisis. Extreme rehtoric cannot be used to justify the wanton destruction of civilian life and infrastructure. If Hizbollah ios carrying out rocket attacks go after them with all you have got, but do not destry civilian life. Israel's justification that Hizbollah is hiding among civilians is not true as everone in Lebanon seems to know the Hizbollah controlled areas.

Given that, what would a cease fire accomplish? Hezbollah will not cease firing for long, and then you'll be right back in the same position. We had eight years of your attitude ruling they day, with Clinton proudly shaking hands with terrorists like Arafat. Where did it get us? It just gave terrorist organizations and the nations that support them eight years of unfettered


An internationally supervised ceasefire will be acceptable to all concerned. The Lebonese middle class during the Cedar Revolution after the death of Hiriri got rid of the Syruians. As long as the Syrians were in charge Hizbollah was under check and Syria did not allow the militia a free hand except on their terms. Now after the exit of Syria from Lebanon, the Hizbullah has grown in strength and to my understanding, Syria is not too comfortable with the growing popularity and strenght of this movement. In retrospect it appears that the withdrawal of Syeria was the starting point of all this. Now let me develop your point a little further. Is it possible for Israel to defeat the Hizbullah militarily in Southern Lebanon. Most analysts believe that should Israel invade the militia will unlrash a gurerilla war and inflict heavy casulities on Israel and Hizbullah will emerge stronger then ever before. Olmert is politically naieve and it is doubtful if Ariel Sharon wouild have undertaken a dangerous mission like this. The Israeli army can fight a convention war, but in an asymmetrical war the advantage is to the Hizbullah. This is my assessment. I wish I am proved wrong.

what happens when extreme heat meets sand? GLASS


Such thoughts of nuclear holocaust should not even be expressed as it only serves to inflame already inflamed passions. This is the time for statecraft not warmongering as innocent lives are being are being destroyed.




"....Bahu...where were your tears when the terrorist bastards were blowing up Israelis?


I have always been on the side of civilians whether in Haifa or oin Beirut. I say once again no one can condone the wanton destruction of human life and if you have been reading what we write I have been condemning the suicide bombs and terrorist attaks on civilians.

on Jul 22, 2006
Israel's justification that Hizbollah is hiding among civilians is not true as everone in Lebanon seems to know the Hizbollah controlled areas.

This is pure bullshit and you know it, or at least would know it if you took your head out of your ass. Just exactly where do you think they place their bunkers and munitions stashes? Under civilian apartment building, mosques, and schools. They do in fact use the civilians as shields and any idiot knows it.

The Lebanese government should have taken control of those areas a long time ago instead of allowing the terrorists to control them. Plain and simple, no amount of talk is going to solve the terrorist problem Terrorists are only interested in death and destruction so that's exactly what they need to be given.
on Jul 22, 2006
A unilateral cease fire is called surrender. And


Not a unilateral ceasefire but as the US itself has asked of Israel Restrait". If there are difficulties with the term ceasefire, Kofi Anan has suggested, cessation of hostilities.


And WHOM is Hezbollah going to listen to? Syria? Iran? If either of those 2, the truth is laid bare, and the jig is up! So WHOM do they follow?

Unilateral cease fire is surrender.
on Jul 22, 2006
Enjoying getting egged everyday baboon virulpackofcigarettes?
on Jul 23, 2006
Under civilian apartment building, mosques, and schools. They do in fact use the civilians as shields and any idiot knows it.


Every Idiot, as you put it may know it, but unfortunately the Israelis do not seem to know. Before you go on spewing venom and hell, remember that just this morning the Israeli struck a hospital in Berirut. There were no Hizbollah bunkers any where in sight. The Israelis are deliberately targetting civilians and in spite of repeated airstrikes they have not ptroduced pfoof of even a single building brought down by US supplied aircrafts and US supplied bombs that they contained bunkers as you put it. This is just the sort of rightwong propaganda that passes off as truth. Unfortunately for each of these lies hundreds of Arabs are dying.
on Jul 23, 2006
This is just the sort of rightwong propaganda that passes off as truth. Unfortunately for each of these lies hundreds of Arabs are dying.


If you're going to proclaim a lie you need to have some proof of such. All I see from you is the typical naive liberal whining that makes your type so laughable. Can you provide any proof that there was no bunker, munitions, or rockets being launched from that location?

Didn't think so.
4 Pages1 2 3  Last