This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
The spreading fire in the Middle East
Published on July 21, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
Isaac Deutcher, the Jewish historian whose entire family perished in the Holocaust made the following observation after the end of the 1967 six day war with the Arab states: "To justify or condone Israel's wars against the Arabs is to render Israel a very bad service and harm its own long term interests". This statement is relevant today as Israel in a blaze of military tiumphalim is close to achieving abbolute mastery over Lebanon. The unrestrained use of firepower, and the highly self righteous rhetoric from Israeli leaders and the undercurrent of racist antagonism against the Arab population and the callous disregatrd for Arab lives--women and children-- not excluded.. all suggest that Israel is using the opportunity provided by the war on terror and the disturbed conditions prevaileing in the region to redraw the boundries to its advantage.

The offensive againt Hamas in Palestine has already cost hundreds of lives and now the war against Lebanon. Hamas, a Sunni outfit and Hizbollah a Shiaa outfit have now joined hands.. It is possible that Israeli military offensive could completely jeopardise the stability of the present regime and the large scale violence and bloodshed unleashed by Israel makes the Lebones population yearn for the days of Syrian occupation. The Maronite Christian and the Druze population were at the forefront of the struggle against Syria aznd having rid Lebanon of Syria, the people find themselves under seige by land, air and sea from a far more ruthless adversary. The Western powers used the pretext provided by the killing of Rafik Hariri to exple the Syrians from Lebanon and the Bekaab Valley. Now the world can see for itself the real gameplan behind the killing of Rafik Hiriri and the expulsion of the Syrians.

The military operations against the Hizbollah will only serve to intensify the problem in the middle east. A parallel with Iraq is obvious. Just as US occupation of Iraq fuelled an isurgency that has now gone out of control, the Israeli presence in SDouthern Lebanon will only intensify the resistance. Isral has gone in for prisoner swaps earlier, why not now. Obviously it wants to use this opportunity to consolodate itself in souther Lebanon and create what it calls a "buffer zone" there. USA has shown lack of political understanding when on the one hand it admits that Israel has used dispropotionate force against the civilian population and on the other uses the threat of veto on the question of a UN sponsored ceasefire

Is rthere any evidence that Iran has instigated the Hizbollah in order to divert attention from the nuclear tangle? In fact the dispropotionate use of air power against the civilian population by Israel itself will be a major talking point that Israel and the USA understand only the language of military might making the solution of the issue more difficult. So far Israel has provided no information about a possible Iranian link except the inuendo that since Hizbollah is a Shiaa organisation it must be a surrogate of the Iran. The logic of such statements is similar to Joseph Macarthy's famous aphorism" It walks like a duck, squacks like a duck so it must be a duck. Unfortunately the Iranian angle to this crisis has not been established. Syria is belamed for everything that happens in Lebanon. In fact it was Syria that brought peace to the war torn country and inspite of the UN intervention it has not been establishe that Syria was involved in the Rafik Hiriri assasination. The Katuysha rockets are of Soviet vintage and there are no signs of direct military support to Hizbollah by Syria. It is obvious that Israel is making thse accusations in order to widen the amit of conflict and draw the US directly into armed confrontation with Iran.

The response of the Arab nations to this unfolding catastrophe has been timid, tepid and spineless. Of course there is no love lost between the Arab powers and the Hizbollah but when Arabs are being killed in such numbers it is a shameless act of perfidy on the part of Arab Governments to remain silent spectators. However on the ground there is overwhelming suppot for the victims of Israeli aggression and that is a dangerous factor in the violent social and political undercurrents of the Middle East.

USA must suppot a ceasefire as desired by the government of Lebanon in the interes of peace and to stem a spiralling humanitarian cris in the region."

Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Jul 29, 2006
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes and no c one can forget that.


Yes, by today's standards they would be war crimes, but today's standards prefers starving children under "sanctions" as a "humane" alternative to war. Apparently "peace" is present as long as tyrants are happy... personally today's standard of peace and humanity makes me sick. Only a total fool would consider Iraq at peace during the 90s... but under today's standard, it was.

Truman made the right decision for the time and situation. The fact that what he did would be considered a war crime now says much more about our sick society than him or his time.
on Jul 29, 2006
It is one of the best pieces of disinformation put out by the Israelui that Hizbollah uses civilians as cover. Not a single UN obverver or even a credible US correspondent like Woolf Blitzer on Annanpour have made that accusation.



Is the UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs credible enough for you?


Jan Egeland, head of UN humanitarion relief has condemned what he calls this "cowardly blending" with civilians. "Hezbollah's leaders", he says, "don't seem to care the slightest bit that it is the children, the women and the civilians that bear the brunt of all of this." Actually, they revel in it. They count on television pictures of dead or dying civilians to create even more hatred in the Arab world.

More of what Mr. Egeland has to say:

Statement of Mr. Jan Egeland,

Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs
and Emergency Relief Coordinator, to the United Nations Security Council on the Humanitarian Situation in the Middle East,
New York, 28 July 2006


"At the same time, I repeatedly and publicly appealed from within Lebanon that the armed men of
Hizbollah must stop their deplorable tactic of hiding ammunition, arms, or combatants among
civilians. Using civilian neighborhoods as human camouflage is abhorrent and in violation of
international humanitarian law."


Read Mr. Egeland's entire statement here: Link


Here's what you don't seem to get. Hezbollah, Hamas, and all their kind intentionally kill civilians and have NO cumpunction about it. When Israel accidentally kills civilians during a response to one of Hezbollah's or Hamas' attacks they regret the deaths profoundly.

That is a huge difference that you constantly refuse to acknowledge.Link
on Jul 29, 2006
Yes, by today's standards they would be war crimes, but today's standards prefers starving children under "sanctions" as a "humane" alternative to war


They count on television pictures of dead or dying civilians to create even more hatred in the Arab world


I am glad that in a way you agree of course with some reservations.

I did read the link. Thank you. Lebanon is an extremely complezx society and the fact is the Israeli bombs do not seem to fall in Druze and Maronite and of course Christian sectors. If Lebanon is so divided then obviously any place Israel bombs must by definition be Hizbullah areas. It is that kind of reductionist logic I seek to avoid. I must add that I deplore the tactics of groups like Hamas and Hizbullah except that I do not appreciate the largescale carnage caused by Israeli bombing. In fact Hizbullah has inflicted more military casualities than civilian and of the 51 Israelis dead 27 happen to be soldiers while more than 600 lebonese have been killed for no fault of theirs.
on Jul 29, 2006
except that I do not appreciate the largescale carnage caused by Israeli bombing.


You don't appreciate it... well, gaaoalleee!

Are you an accountant by training, Bahu? You seem to have an accounting approach to war, one that dictates maintenance of the status quo ante since all offensives in war must be proportionate. The terrorists would laugh at your naive notions.
on Jul 30, 2006
Are you an accountant by training, Bahu? You seem to have an accounting approach to war, one that dictates maintenance of the status quo ante since all offensives in war must be proportionate


No I am not an accountant but you do not seem to understand that anyone with even a shred of humanity cannot condone the barbarity with which Israel has bombed civilian sectors of souther Lebanon and Beirut not to mention Gaza. Targetted killing on this scale is a war crime and Israel is able to do this only because the US government is idly standing by, if not being a downright cheerleader of the Israelis. I have no regard for what the Hizbollah and its surrogates say but a ceasefire is a must in order to prevent further bloodshed. Just think of the plight of a young mother whose story was published all over the world. She is now a refugee in Beirut University Campus having seen her 4 children killed in front of her eyes. With carnage like that you can never get peace an armistice till the next round and that is exactly what the Bush _Blair duo do not seem to understand.
on Jul 30, 2006
"Targetted killing on this scale is a war crime..."


Wow...

- ...I was saying the same thing as I watched snipers killing starving people rushing out to pick up Red Cross Aid drops in Sarajevo.

- ...I was saying the same thing when I sat and watched a million people murdered in Rwanda and the US President Clinton said that we'd only intervene in conflicts that were in our interest, and informed his secretary of state not to use the 'genocide' word for it.

- ...I was saying the same thing when Hussein was killing entire subpopulations in his nation. When his underlings were escaping and telling the world how he said they wouldn't be worse off with a few million less people in Iraq, I was outraged, too.

I think you'll find the world's idea of what a war crime changes proportionally given what they are willing to step in and stop. All those years I watched killing on an industrial scale, but under 300 Lebanese are an OUTRAGE and suddenly the world has to TAKE ACTION!!! I guess the fact that Israel has something to do with it doesn't have much impact.

You'll pardon me a bitter chuckle. Those "Liberals" around the world who now condemn Israel couldn't use the 'g' word in Rwanda for fear of being asked to do something about it. No, I don't see your outrage as being particularly compelling, nor as a student of current events and history do I think that your assertion of a 'war crime' here has much impact.
on Aug 14, 2006
Anyone reading this post after the ceasefire effecred by UN resolution 1701 will realise that Israel has not reached even a singlr objective, i.e. stated and explicit objective and we knew all along that this would be the case.
on Aug 14, 2006
I love it when the loons completely blame Israel and act like the terrorists are the victims. How sad.


Actually I do believe Israel have been absolutle bullies in their campaign. They over reacted monumentally!
on Aug 14, 2006
Anyone reading this post after the ceasefire effecred by UN resolution 1701 will realise that Israel has not reached even a singlr objective, i.e. stated and explicit objective and we knew all along that this would be the case.

Then tell me how a cease-fire is "in Israel's interest" again.
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4