This blog explores the contemporary political and cultural trends from a distinct perspective
The spreading fire in the Middle East
Published on July 21, 2006 By Bahu Virupaksha In Politics
Isaac Deutcher, the Jewish historian whose entire family perished in the Holocaust made the following observation after the end of the 1967 six day war with the Arab states: "To justify or condone Israel's wars against the Arabs is to render Israel a very bad service and harm its own long term interests". This statement is relevant today as Israel in a blaze of military tiumphalim is close to achieving abbolute mastery over Lebanon. The unrestrained use of firepower, and the highly self righteous rhetoric from Israeli leaders and the undercurrent of racist antagonism against the Arab population and the callous disregatrd for Arab lives--women and children-- not excluded.. all suggest that Israel is using the opportunity provided by the war on terror and the disturbed conditions prevaileing in the region to redraw the boundries to its advantage.

The offensive againt Hamas in Palestine has already cost hundreds of lives and now the war against Lebanon. Hamas, a Sunni outfit and Hizbollah a Shiaa outfit have now joined hands.. It is possible that Israeli military offensive could completely jeopardise the stability of the present regime and the large scale violence and bloodshed unleashed by Israel makes the Lebones population yearn for the days of Syrian occupation. The Maronite Christian and the Druze population were at the forefront of the struggle against Syria aznd having rid Lebanon of Syria, the people find themselves under seige by land, air and sea from a far more ruthless adversary. The Western powers used the pretext provided by the killing of Rafik Hariri to exple the Syrians from Lebanon and the Bekaab Valley. Now the world can see for itself the real gameplan behind the killing of Rafik Hiriri and the expulsion of the Syrians.

The military operations against the Hizbollah will only serve to intensify the problem in the middle east. A parallel with Iraq is obvious. Just as US occupation of Iraq fuelled an isurgency that has now gone out of control, the Israeli presence in SDouthern Lebanon will only intensify the resistance. Isral has gone in for prisoner swaps earlier, why not now. Obviously it wants to use this opportunity to consolodate itself in souther Lebanon and create what it calls a "buffer zone" there. USA has shown lack of political understanding when on the one hand it admits that Israel has used dispropotionate force against the civilian population and on the other uses the threat of veto on the question of a UN sponsored ceasefire

Is rthere any evidence that Iran has instigated the Hizbollah in order to divert attention from the nuclear tangle? In fact the dispropotionate use of air power against the civilian population by Israel itself will be a major talking point that Israel and the USA understand only the language of military might making the solution of the issue more difficult. So far Israel has provided no information about a possible Iranian link except the inuendo that since Hizbollah is a Shiaa organisation it must be a surrogate of the Iran. The logic of such statements is similar to Joseph Macarthy's famous aphorism" It walks like a duck, squacks like a duck so it must be a duck. Unfortunately the Iranian angle to this crisis has not been established. Syria is belamed for everything that happens in Lebanon. In fact it was Syria that brought peace to the war torn country and inspite of the UN intervention it has not been establishe that Syria was involved in the Rafik Hiriri assasination. The Katuysha rockets are of Soviet vintage and there are no signs of direct military support to Hizbollah by Syria. It is obvious that Israel is making thse accusations in order to widen the amit of conflict and draw the US directly into armed confrontation with Iran.

The response of the Arab nations to this unfolding catastrophe has been timid, tepid and spineless. Of course there is no love lost between the Arab powers and the Hizbollah but when Arabs are being killed in such numbers it is a shameless act of perfidy on the part of Arab Governments to remain silent spectators. However on the ground there is overwhelming suppot for the victims of Israeli aggression and that is a dangerous factor in the violent social and political undercurrents of the Middle East.

USA must suppot a ceasefire as desired by the government of Lebanon in the interes of peace and to stem a spiralling humanitarian cris in the region."

Comments (Page 2)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Jul 23, 2006
There are no innocents. People living there (just as here) do have an opinion one way or the other. You cannot attend a rally one day supporting your cause (with your kids dressed up in masks and toy weapons) and be a poor victim the next day. You cannot hide a rocket in your basement and say hey I was just holding it for someone else. If I agreed with the Hezbollah, I’d take my lumps and if I agreed with Israel, I’d be pointing them to the weapons dump location or getting the heck out of Dodge. Unfortunately wars must be brutal so nobody wants to fight one. Half measures just create a new breed of hate a few years later, especially in the vendetta rife Middle East. Personally I'd want my children to live for their country. Is there nothing more productive to do there than shoot at each other? What a land of sheep that will follow the first disgruntled nut-job that comes by. Let them blow themselves up for there belief or imaginary line, just don't ask my kids to do the dirty work. I know people are horrified about nuclear war, but in the only test case available it was very effective in stopping a terrible conflict. Japan has not fought another war since.
on Jul 24, 2006
Can you provide any proof that there was no bunker, munitions, or rockets being launched from that location?


The onus is on the Israelis to prove that the sites from which the Katusha rockets were launched were indeed residential areas. This is like the Weapons of Mass Destruction story put out by the US media to justify the brutal and increasingly savage attgack on Iraq. We now know thatr there were no WMD and 250,000 lives later an society destrohyed. The same is the case with the lie being trotted out to justify Israels Crimes against Humanity. This is the assesments of the Canadian diplomat. Now you are arguingh that Israel has the right to bomc civilian target in Lebanon on the flimsy assumption that rockets are hidden in them. This is only a fjustificvation for a genocide and and a reasoned and critical perspective would treat both Hizbollah and the Israelis alike.
on Jul 24, 2006
"This is like the Weapons of Mass Destruction story put out by the US media to justify the brutal and increasingly savage attgack on Iraq. We now know thatr there were no WMD and 250,000 lives later an society destrohyed. The same is the case with the lie being trotted out to justify Israels Crimes against Humanity. This is the assesments of the Canadian diplomat."


It isn't crimes against humanity any more than any other war. Show me war in the modern era that didn't feature the exact thing that Israel is doing now. Lebanon thwarted resolution 1559, EMBRACED Hezbollah as their resistance to Israel, and welcomed them into their government. That makes Hezbollah's attacks acts a national effort and, frankly, acts of war on Israel.

Your standard of crimes against humanity is facetious, given there's no possible way to make war without committing such crimes, and the fact that Hezbollah commits worse with the approval of the Lebanese government and you say nothing.
on Jul 24, 2006
The onus is on the Israelis to prove

No. You are the one who has claimed a lie, the onus is upon you to prove your claim.

As for the rockets being fired from populated areas, that has already been shown to be true. Members of the press covering the action have filmed and shown the film of the rockets being fired from those areas. So much for your "lie". There's someone telling lies here, and the name is Bahu (as usual).

And once again you place the blame against those being attacked by terrorists instead of the terrorists themselves. Why not just admit you're a closet terrorist yourself?
on Jul 24, 2006
Bahu, where is your complaints about Hez firing on Israeli hospitals.

I can't stand all these terrorist supporting loons here.
on Jul 25, 2006
Even the American Sec of State Condi Rice seemed quite contrite over the Israeli air strikes against Beirut. In fact there has been coverage in BBC and CNN over Israeli strikes against hospitals.
on Jul 25, 2006
Bahu, if you take requests, would you please sometime describe how you think war should be fought?
on Jul 25, 2006
Bahu, if you take requests, would you please sometime describe how you think war should be fought?


Wars are faught against other armies, and in these days of asymmetrical armed conflict with other armed groups motivated with a political or ideological purposes. Attacking civilians in an indiscri,imate manner as Israel is doing is not war it is slaughter and violated the rules of civilised warfare, yes, there are rules of warfare. Why did USA enter World War I: the sinking of the USS Lusitania., a civilian carrier with the loss of innocent civilian life. Civilians cannot be the primary target of war on the grounds that the enemy hides in their midst.
on Jul 25, 2006
Could you name for me a war in which what Israel is doing now wasn't enacted by both sides? Can you name for me a war in which both sides didn't do worse? Not Grenada, mind you, but a real war.

You pretend that targeting civilian infrastructure is somehow targeting civilians, but there's never been a war when we didn't target the power, transportation, etc., infrastructure of the nations we warred against. You think we didn't blow up bridges, dams, railroads, etc in every war we fought? That we left the German bomb factories cranking out bombs day and night because we couldn't strike civilian workers or knock out their power?

Please, pose your arguments within a reality we all have access to. Israel could have killed hundreds of thousands of people in a compressed nation like Lebanon in the first few days of this had they wished to specifically target civilians. I believe that you are far, far too schooled in history to think that your standard is anything close to the accepted reality of warfare.
on Jul 25, 2006
Which agreement between Israel and any Arab entity has resulted in more than a pitiful moment's "peace"? All agreements, ceasefires, accords and other documents signed in pursuit of "peace" have been utter and complete failures. They have never saved a life, ended a conflict, or resulted in one side refusing to kill the other.

Peace between Israel and the Arab world is a LIE. The only thing that the "agreements" have done is allowed the two sides to regroup and "diplomats" to accept sham peace awards and tv face time.

There is no peace in the middle east because neither of the powers that be in the Middle East are willing to refrain from annhilating the other side.

Peace has to be redefined into a total lie before anyone can say that "peace" ever existed there in historic memory.
on Jul 25, 2006
Wars are faught against other armies, and in these days of asymmetrical armed conflict with other armed groups motivated with a political or ideological purposes. Attacking civilians in an indiscri,imate manner as Israel is doing is not war it is slaughter and violated the rules of civilised warfare, yes, there are rules of warfare. Why did USA enter World War I: the sinking of the USS Lusitania., a civilian carrier with the loss of innocent civilian life. Civilians cannot be the primary target of war on the grounds that the enemy hides in their midst.


Tell that to the Palestinians!!!



Terrorists Open Fire on Memorial Ceremony (10.5.04)

Palestinian terrorists, one of them apparently dressed as a woman, opened fire at hundreds of Jews who came to participate in a memorial ceremony for the Hatuel family in Gush Katif this evening. "Bullets whistled past our ears, and between our legs, and miraculously, no one was hurt," said Gaza Coast spokesman Eran Sternberg. IDF soldiers killed two of the attackers.

In response to the attack, IDF bulldozers have, since this morning, been demolishing 13 houses owned by Arabs that have been used as cover for terrorist attacks along the Kisufim Route into Gush Katif. The residents have long demanded such an action, which was stopped by past Supreme Court rulings.

"It was a humiliating experience for Jews who come to remember a slaughtered family to have to crouch and lie down while terrorists shoot wildly around," said David Hatuel afterward yesterday's attack. "Why can't the army protect a road just a few kilometers long? The houses that line the road must be torn down!" Hatuel lost his pregnant wife and their four daughters, aged 2-11, a week ago when Palestinian terrorists shot and killed them at point-blank range on the Kisufim entrance road to Gush Katif.
on Jul 25, 2006
Even the American Sec of State Condi Rice seemed quite contrite over the Israeli air strikes against Beirut. In fact there has been coverage in BBC and CNN over Israeli strikes against hospitals.


The BBC and CNN...I can't stop laughing.
on Jul 25, 2006
HEZBOLLAH yesterday dismissed proposals for a ceasefire in Lebanon from the United States secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, after she made a surprise stop in Beirut on her way to Israel.
on Jul 25, 2006
on Jul 26, 2006
Istrael is resisting a ceasefire with US complicity for two contrary reason. On the one hand it believes it can disarm the Hizbollah by imposing unacceptable level of civilain carnage. Now the Arab public opinion is united against Israel and a durable peace is not possible without an honorable settelement of the Middle East question. Second, the 15 kilometer secrurity zone will not stabalise the border as that would only make the area vulnerable to guerrila attacks. Even now the Hizbullzah is putting up Resistance that the IDF did not expect and witth mounting casualities even the supine Arab leadership has to act.
4 Pages1 2 3 4